Model comparison
Kimi K2.6 vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
Kimi K2.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.5 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2.6 scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Kimi K2.6 leads 53.9 to 19.2.
Side by side
| Kimi K2.6 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 47.5 | 32.2 |
| Released | 2026-04-20 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | — |
| Max output | 262K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.95 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $4 | — |
| Results tracked | 51 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Kimi K2.6 leads
Kimi K2.6: 50.5 (#41), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.6 (#222)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.6 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1488 | 1210 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 76.7% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1509 | — |
| SciCode | 53.5% | — |
| WeirdML | 55.9% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,093 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Kimi K2.6: 21.8 (#128), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.6 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OSWorld 2.0 | 4.6% | — |
| ExploitBench | 18.4% | — |
| GBAEval | 0.9% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 12% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 6,205 | — |
Reasoning Kimi K2.6 leads
Kimi K2.6: 39.6 (#51), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 22.6 (#174)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.6 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1470 | 1208 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 87.2% | — |
| CritPt | 8% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 26% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 2.4% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 18% | — |
| DTBench | 90.9% | — |
| LMCA | 37.3% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 151.03 | — |
Math Kimi K2.6 leads
Kimi K2.6: 56.8 (#34), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 24.8 (#255)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.6 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1475 | 1208 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 57.2% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 25.6% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 72.9% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 96.1% | — |
| ProofBench | 16% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 16.1% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 39% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 14.6% | — |
Knowledge Kimi K2.6 leads
Kimi K2.6: 53.9 (#48), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.2 (#274)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.6 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 90.8% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 34.9% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 41.4% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 10.8% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 28.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1491 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Kimi K2.6: 31.8 (#95), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.6 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1282 | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 3.9% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 21.7% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1451 | — |
Multilingual Kimi K2.6 leads
Kimi K2.6: 55.1 (#35), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.0 (#243)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.6 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1446 | 1160 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1521 | 1192 |
| LMArena Russian | 1446 | 1187 |
| LMArena French | 1471 | — |
| LMArena German | 1449 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1442 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1428 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1463 | — |
Instruction Following Kimi K2.6 leads
Kimi K2.6: 76.5 (#40), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.8 (#238)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.6 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1451 | 1186 |
| IFEval | — | 78% |
Long Context Kimi K2.6 leads
Kimi K2.6: 44.9 (#50), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#229)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.6 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1468 | 1194 |
Writing & Preference Kimi K2.6 leads
Kimi K2.6: 68.7 (#25), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.3 (#231)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.6 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1455 | 1218 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1434 | 1199 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1453 | 1221 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1725 | — |
| WildBench | — | 73.4% |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1202 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Kimi K2.6 better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?
Kimi K2.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.5 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Kimi K2.6 or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?
Kimi K2.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.5 versus 34.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Kimi K2.6 and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2.6 has 51 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.