Model comparison
Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B
Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.6 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) leads 52.3 to 15.5.
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 48.6 | 29.7 |
| Released | 2026-02-17 | 2024-12-31 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| Max output | 30K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.25 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.50 | — |
| Results tracked | 46 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) leads
Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning): 42.1 (#112), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1375 | — |
| WeirdML | 52.3% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 10.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1459 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,150 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning): 34.4 (#46), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 57.3% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 18% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1189 | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 4,663 | — |
Reasoning Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) leads
Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning): 52.3 (#32), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 65.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 75% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 85.4% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 89.5% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 24% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 63.8% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 16.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1451 | — |
| DTBench | 90.1% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 20.6% |
| LMCA | 38.7% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 151.98 | — |
| ForecastBench | 61.4 | — |
| LiveBench | — | 22.1% |
Math Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) leads
Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning): 48.2 (#65), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 44.9% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 17.1% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 92.2% | — |
| ProofBench | 14% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 15.6% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 13.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1455 | — |
Knowledge Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) leads
Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning): 52.8 (#60), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 89.3% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 30.2% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 31% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 31.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1439 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning): 33.3 (#98), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1263 | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 0% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1416 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning): 54.5 (#40), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1441 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1481 | — |
| LMArena French | 1476 | — |
| LMArena German | 1465 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1449 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1417 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1458 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1443 | — |
Instruction Following Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) leads
Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning): 74.8 (#83), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 60.6% |
| IFEval | — | 73% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning): 45.5 (#34), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| CL-bench | 22.2% | — |
| CL-bench Life | 11.9% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1437 | — |
Writing & Preference Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) leads
Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning): 65.7 (#44), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1451 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1438 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1574 | — |
| WildBench | — | 68.9% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1456 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 11.2% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?
Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.6 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?
Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.1 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) has 46 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.