Model comparison
Kimi K2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Super
Kimi K2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.8 to 39.6 on the Noometry Index. Nemotron 3 Super costs 5.2× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Kimi K2.5's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 21 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIASummary
- They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2.5 scores higher in 8 categories and Nemotron 3 Super in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Kimi K2.5 leads 53.6 to 38.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 69.9% for Kimi K2.5 and 15.4% for Nemotron 3 Super.
- Nemotron 3 Super is cheaper at $0.08 / $0.45 per million input/output tokens, against $0.45 / $2.25 for Kimi K2.5.
Side by side
| Kimi K2.5 | Nemotron 3 Super | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | NVIDIA |
| Noometry Index | 47.8 | 39.6 |
| Released | 2026-01-27 | 2026-03-11 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | 262K |
| Max output | 262K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.45 | $0.08 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.25 | $0.45 |
| Results tracked | 51 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Kimi K2.5 leads
Kimi K2.5: 48.7 (#48), Nemotron 3 Super: 38.9 (#153)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 49% | 36% |
| WeirdML | 45.6% | 38% |
| LMArena Coding | 1474 | 1403 |
| ALE-Bench | 821.65 | 213.9 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 73.8% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 70.8% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1436 | — |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | 67.3% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Kimi K2.5: 34.0 (#44), Nemotron 3 Super: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 43.2% | — |
| OSWorld | 63.3% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 1,198 | — |
Reasoning Kimi K2.5 leads
Kimi K2.5: 31.2 (#74), Nemotron 3 Super: 17.9 (#274)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 69.9% | 15.4% |
| CritPt | 3.1% | 3.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1454 | 1386 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 11.8% | — |
| SimpleBench | 46.8% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 78.5% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 65.3% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 12% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 3.4% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 69.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 148.05 | — |
Math Kimi K2.5 leads
Kimi K2.5: 50.3 (#46), Nemotron 3 Super: 37.6 (#95)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 62.3% | 60.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1470 | 1381 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 92.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 27.9% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 4.2% | — |
Knowledge Kimi K2.5 leads
Kimi K2.5: 53.6 (#52), Nemotron 3 Super: 38.2 (#136)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1466 | 1397 |
| GPQA Diamond | 87.6% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 24.4% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 34.3% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 14.2% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Kimi K2.5: 40.4 (#37), Nemotron 3 Super: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1269 | — |
| LMArena Document | 1430 | — |
Multilingual Kimi K2.5 leads
Kimi K2.5: 54.1 (#50), Nemotron 3 Super: 48.6 (#139)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1433 | 1356 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1495 | 1430 |
| LMArena French | 1454 | 1404 |
| LMArena German | 1441 | 1341 |
| LMArena Russian | 1436 | 1336 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1450 | 1417 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1422 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1412 | — |
Instruction Following Kimi K2.5 leads
Kimi K2.5: 75.5 (#60), Nemotron 3 Super: 71.4 (#149)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1431 | 1347 |
Long Context Kimi K2.5 leads
Kimi K2.5: 52.1 (#7), Nemotron 3 Super: 41.5 (#134)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1445 | 1362 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 86.1% | — |
| CL-bench | 19.3% | — |
| CL-bench Life | 13.2% | — |
Writing & Preference Kimi K2.5 leads
Kimi K2.5: 65.3 (#51), Nemotron 3 Super: 56.1 (#135)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1445 | 1378 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1423 | 1317 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1444 | 1369 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1579 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Kimi K2.5 better than Nemotron 3 Super?
Kimi K2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.8 to 39.6 on the Noometry Index. Nemotron 3 Super costs 5.2× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Kimi K2.5's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Kimi K2.5 or Nemotron 3 Super?
Nemotron 3 Super is cheaper. It lists at $0.08 per million input tokens and $0.45 per million output tokens; Kimi K2.5 lists at $0.45 and $2.25.
Is Kimi K2.5 or Nemotron 3 Super better for coding?
Kimi K2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.7 versus 38.9 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Both accept 262K tokens.
How many benchmarks do Kimi K2.5 and Nemotron 3 Super share?
21 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2.5 has 51 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 3 Super has 21.