Model comparison

Kimi K2.5 vs Step 3

Kimi K2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.1 to 40.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Kimi K2.5 Moonshot AI

48.1

Rank #57 Confirmed

Step 3 StepFun

40.5

Rank #149 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2.5 scores higher in 9 categories and Step 3 in 0 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Kimi K2.5 leads 53.6 to 36.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 78.5% for Kimi K2.5 and 62.3% for Step 3.

Side by side

Kimi K2.5 and Step 3 specifications
Kimi K2.5Step 3
ProviderMoonshot AIStepFun
Noometry Index48.140.5
Released2026-01-27—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K—
Max output262K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.45—
Output $ / M tokens$2.25—
Results tracked5117

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Kimi K2.5 leads

Kimi K2.5: 48.8 (#53), Step 3: 40.1 (#147)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5Step 3
LMArena Coding14741367
SWE-bench Verified73.8%—
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)70.8%—
LMArena WebDev1437—
SWE-bench Multilingual67.3%—
SciCode49%—
WeirdML45.6%—
ALE-Bench821.65—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Kimi K2.5: 34.2 (#48), Step 3: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5Step 3
Terminal-Bench43.2%—
OSWorld63.3%—
Vending-Bench 21,198—

Reasoning Kimi K2.5 leads

Kimi K2.5: 31.2 (#80), Step 3: 28.4 (#105)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5Step 3
Kagi LLM Benchmark78.5%62.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts14531355
ARC-AGI-211.8%—
SimpleBench46.8%—
NYT Connections (extended)69.9%—
ARC-AGI-165.3%—
CritPt3.1%—
Chess Puzzles12%—
EnigmaEval3.4%—
Thematic Generalization69.4%—
Epoch Capabilities Index148.03—

Math Kimi K2.5 leads

Kimi K2.5: 51.8 (#53), Step 3: 37.6 (#148)

Knowledge Kimi K2.5 leads

Kimi K2.5: 53.6 (#56), Step 3: 36.8 (#164)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5Step 3
LMArena Expert14661333
GPQA Diamond87.6%—
Humanity's Last Exam24.4%—
SimpleQA Verified34.3%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate14.2%—

Multimodal Kimi K2.5 leads

Kimi K2.5: 41.1 (#39), Step 3: 35.5 (#86)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5Step 3
LMArena Vision12691177
LMArena Document1430—

Multilingual Kimi K2.5 leads

Kimi K2.5: 53.9 (#53), Step 3: 46.3 (#159)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5Step 3
LMArena Non-English14331327
LMArena Chinese14951397
LMArena German14411371
LMArena Korean14101269
LMArena Russian14351331
LMArena Spanish14501371
LMArena French1454—
LMArena Japanese1421—

Instruction Following Kimi K2.5 leads

Kimi K2.5: 75.3 (#64), Step 3: 70.4 (#164)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5Step 3
LMArena Instruction Following14311332

Long Context Kimi K2.5 leads

Kimi K2.5: 52.1 (#7), Step 3: 40.3 (#157)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5Step 3
LMArena Longer Query14451326
Fiction.LiveBench86.1%—
CL-bench19.3%—
CL-bench Life13.2%—

Writing & Preference Kimi K2.5 leads

Kimi K2.5: 65.1 (#53), Step 3: 54.3 (#151)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5Step 3
LMArena Text14451350
LMArena Creative Writing14231321
LMArena Multi-Turn14441341
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1579—

Frequently asked questions

Is Kimi K2.5 better than Step 3?

Kimi K2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.1 to 40.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Kimi K2.5 or Step 3 better for coding?

Kimi K2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.8 versus 40.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Kimi K2.5 and Step 3 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2.5 has 51 scored results on Noometry and Step 3 has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper