Model comparison

Kimi K2.5 vs Mistral

Kimi K2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.1 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Kimi K2.5 Moonshot AI

48.1

Rank #57 Confirmed

Mistral Mistral AI

29.9

Rank #303 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2.5 scores higher in 8 categories and Mistral in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Kimi K2.5 leads 53.6 to 16.6.
  • Kimi K2.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Kimi K2.5 and Mistral specifications
Kimi K2.5Mistral
ProviderMoonshot AIMistral AI
Noometry Index48.129.9
Released2026-01-27—
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window262K—
Max output262K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.45—
Output $ / M tokens$2.25—
Results tracked5122

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Kimi K2.5 leads

Kimi K2.5: 48.8 (#53), Mistral: 33.8 (#250)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5Mistral
LMArena Coding14741162
SWE-bench Verified73.8%—
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)70.8%—
LMArena WebDev1437—
SWE-bench Multilingual67.3%—
SciCode49%—
WeirdML45.6%—
ALE-Bench821.65—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Kimi K2.5: 34.2 (#48), Mistral: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5Mistral
Terminal-Bench43.2%—
OSWorld63.3%—
Vending-Bench 21,198—

Reasoning Kimi K2.5 leads

Kimi K2.5: 31.2 (#80), Mistral: 22.2 (#200)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5Mistral
LMArena Hard Prompts14531149
ARC-AGI-211.8%—
SimpleBench46.8%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark78.5%—
NYT Connections (extended)69.9%—
ARC-AGI-165.3%—
CritPt3.1%—
Chess Puzzles12%—
EnigmaEval3.4%—
Thematic Generalization69.4%—
Epoch Capabilities Index148.03—

Math Kimi K2.5 leads

Kimi K2.5: 51.8 (#53), Mistral: 22.3 (#278)

Knowledge Kimi K2.5 leads

Kimi K2.5: 53.6 (#56), Mistral: 16.6 (#288)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5Mistral
LMArena Expert14661125
GPQA Diamond87.6%—
Humanity's Last Exam24.4%—
SimpleQA Verified34.3%—
MMLU-Pro—27.7%
Vectara Hallucination Rate14.2%—
GPQA (HELM)—30.3%

Multimodal Not comparable

Kimi K2.5: 41.1 (#39), Mistral: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5Mistral
LMArena Vision1269—
LMArena Document1430—

Multilingual Kimi K2.5 leads

Kimi K2.5: 53.9 (#53), Mistral: 32.8 (#254)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5Mistral
LMArena Non-English14331129
LMArena Chinese14951109
LMArena French14541180
LMArena German14411155
LMArena Japanese14211013
LMArena Korean14101032
LMArena Russian14351168
LMArena Spanish14501143

Instruction Following Kimi K2.5 leads

Kimi K2.5: 75.3 (#64), Mistral: 52.6 (#288)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5Mistral
LMArena Instruction Following14311152
IFEval—56.8%

Long Context Kimi K2.5 leads

Kimi K2.5: 52.1 (#7), Mistral: 35.0 (#245)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5Mistral
LMArena Longer Query14451153
Fiction.LiveBench86.1%—
CL-bench19.3%—
CL-bench Life13.2%—

Writing & Preference Kimi K2.5 leads

Kimi K2.5: 65.1 (#53), Mistral: 37.0 (#260)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5Mistral
LMArena Text14451165
LMArena Creative Writing14231158
LMArena Multi-Turn14441147
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1579—
WildBench—66%

Frequently asked questions

Is Kimi K2.5 better than Mistral?

Kimi K2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.1 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Kimi K2.5 or Mistral better for coding?

Kimi K2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.8 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Kimi K2.5 and Mistral share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2.5 has 51 scored results on Noometry and Mistral has 22.

Related comparisons

Go deeper