Model comparison
Kimi K2.5 Instant vs Qwen1.5-32B
Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 30.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2.5 Instant scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen1.5-32B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Kimi K2.5 Instant leads 40.2 to 13.5.
Side by side
| Kimi K2.5 Instant | Qwen1.5-32B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 43.6 | 30.5 |
| Released | — | 2024-02-04 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 18 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 42.6 (#97), Qwen1.5-32B: 31.7 (#282)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1484 | 1155 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1404 | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 32.3% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 42% |
Reasoning Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 29.7 (#90), Qwen1.5-32B: 21.8 (#212)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1443 | 1130 |
Math Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 39.4 (#105), Qwen1.5-32B: 33.0 (#207)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1442 | 1155 |
Knowledge Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 40.2 (#123), Qwen1.5-32B: 13.5 (#296)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1440 | 1126 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 30.7% |
| MMLU | — | 74.4% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 40.2 (#50), Qwen1.5-32B: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1254 | — |
Multilingual Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 52.0 (#94), Qwen1.5-32B: 31.4 (#259)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1406 | 1106 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1449 | 1177 |
| LMArena French | 1403 | 1101 |
| LMArena German | 1413 | 1058 |
| LMArena Korean | 1378 | 1008 |
| LMArena Russian | 1404 | 1073 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1447 | 1089 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1027 |
Instruction Following Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 75.3 (#65), Qwen1.5-32B: 57.7 (#265)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1430 | 1116 |
Long Context Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 43.9 (#83), Qwen1.5-32B: 34.7 (#246)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1435 | 1146 |
Writing & Preference Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 60.6 (#95), Qwen1.5-32B: 34.2 (#271)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1420 | 1137 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1381 | 1083 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1427 | 1140 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Kimi K2.5 Instant better than Qwen1.5-32B?
Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 30.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Kimi K2.5 Instant or Qwen1.5-32B better for coding?
Kimi K2.5 Instant scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.6 versus 31.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Kimi K2.5 Instant and Qwen1.5-32B share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2.5 Instant has 18 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-32B has 21.