Model comparison

Gemma 4 31B IT vs Qwen1.5-32B

Gemma 4 31B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 4 31B IT Google

43.2

Rank #85 Confirmed

Qwen1.5-32B Alibaba (Qwen)

30.0

Rank #288 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 4 31B IT scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen1.5-32B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemma 4 31B IT leads 60.7 to 34.4.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 75.8% for Gemma 4 31B IT and 30.7% for Qwen1.5-32B.

Side by side

Gemma 4 31B IT and Qwen1.5-32B specifications
Gemma 4 31B ITQwen1.5-32B
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index43.230.0
Released2026-04-022024-02-04
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K—
Max output33K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.09—
Output $ / M tokens$0.34—
Results tracked3521

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 41.9 (#98), Qwen1.5-32B: 31.1 (#278)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITQwen1.5-32B
LMArena Coding14591155
LMArena WebDev1364—
SciCode43.4%—
WeirdML52.3%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—32.3%
BigCodeBench Complete—42%
ALE-Bench925.5—

Reasoning Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 26.4 (#119), Qwen1.5-32B: 20.9 (#210)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITQwen1.5-32B
LMArena Hard Prompts14481131
Kagi LLM Benchmark63.5%—
NYT Connections (extended)70.6%—
CritPt1.4%—
Chess Puzzles5%—
Thematic Generalization53%—
DTBench82.7%—
LMCA39.3%—
Surface Evolver Bench30.6%—
Epoch Capabilities Index142.74—

Math Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 41.3 (#72), Qwen1.5-32B: 30.5 (#207)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITQwen1.5-32B
LMArena Math14641155
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202573.3%—

Knowledge Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 37.9 (#141), Qwen1.5-32B: 13.5 (#291)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITQwen1.5-32B
GPQA Diamond75.8%30.7%
LMArena Expert14651126
SimpleQA Verified10.4%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate7.4%—
MMLU—74.4%

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 4 31B IT: 41.0 (#32), Qwen1.5-32B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITQwen1.5-32B
LMArena Vision1278—
LMArena Document1425—

Multilingual Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 54.0 (#52), Qwen1.5-32B: 31.6 (#254)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITQwen1.5-32B
LMArena Non-English14311106
LMArena Chinese14781176
LMArena French14361100
LMArena Russian14621073
LMArena Spanish14431089
LMArena German—1058
LMArena Japanese—1027
LMArena Korean—1007

Instruction Following Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 75.6 (#58), Qwen1.5-32B: 58.0 (#260)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITQwen1.5-32B
LMArena Instruction Following14331116

Long Context Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 44.2 (#67), Qwen1.5-32B: 34.7 (#241)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITQwen1.5-32B
LMArena Longer Query14461146

Writing & Preference Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 60.7 (#92), Qwen1.5-32B: 34.4 (#266)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITQwen1.5-32B
LMArena Text14431137
LMArena Creative Writing14161083
LMArena Multi-Turn14521140
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1368—
EQ-Bench 41120—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 4 31B IT better than Qwen1.5-32B?

Gemma 4 31B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 4 31B IT or Qwen1.5-32B better for coding?

Gemma 4 31B IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.9 versus 31.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 4 31B IT and Qwen1.5-32B share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 4 31B IT has 35 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-32B has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper