Model comparison
Kimi K2.5 Instant vs Qwen-14B
Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2.5 Instant scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen-14B in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Kimi K2.5 Instant leads 60.8 to 27.8.
Side by side
| Kimi K2.5 Instant | Qwen-14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 42.9 | 30.8 |
| Released | — | 2023-09-24 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 18 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 42.3 (#95), Qwen-14B: 30.6 (#283)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1483 | 1072 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1404 | — |
Reasoning Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 28.5 (#88), Qwen-14B: 18.7 (#255)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1443 | 1027 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 55% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 112.8 |
| LAMBADA | — | 71.1% |
| PIQA | — | 79.9% |
Math Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 36.6 (#105), Qwen-14B: 28.7 (#224)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1443 | 1068 |
| GSM8K | — | 61.3% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 39.5 (#121), Qwen-14B: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1438 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 84.4% |
| BoolQ | — | 86.2% |
| MMLU | — | 66.3% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 39.5 (#47), Qwen-14B: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1254 | — |
Multilingual Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 52.2 (#89), Qwen-14B: 27.7 (#270)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1406 | 1042 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1450 | 1077 |
| LMArena French | 1403 | — |
| LMArena German | 1413 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1378 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1404 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1448 | — |
Instruction Following Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 75.5 (#61), Qwen-14B: 52.6 (#284)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1430 | 1031 |
Long Context Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 43.8 (#82), Qwen-14B: 31.3 (#276)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1435 | 1029 |
Writing & Preference Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 60.8 (#91), Qwen-14B: 27.8 (#294)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1420 | 1051 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1379 | 1028 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1427 | 1022 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Kimi K2.5 Instant better than Qwen-14B?
Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Kimi K2.5 Instant or Qwen-14B better for coding?
Kimi K2.5 Instant scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.3 versus 30.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Kimi K2.5 Instant and Qwen-14B share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2.5 Instant has 18 scored results on Noometry and Qwen-14B has 18.