Model comparison
Kimi K2.7 Code vs Qwen-14B
Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.3 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Kimi K2.7 Code scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen-14B in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Kimi K2.7 Code leads 52.9 to 31.2.
Side by side
| Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen-14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 43.3 | 31.4 |
| Released | 2026-06-12 | 2023-09-24 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | — |
| Max output | 262K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.95 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $4 | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Kimi K2.7 Code leads
Kimi K2.7 Code: 42.9 (#95), Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#288)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | 30.5% | — |
| FrontierCode | 30.1% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1473 | — |
| SciCode | 47.5% | — |
| WeirdML | 54.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1071 |
| ALE-Bench | 886.23 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Kimi K2.7 Code: 24.0 (#122), Qwen-14B: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 37.6% | — |
| GBAEval | 0.9% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 5,083 | — |
Reasoning Kimi K2.7 Code leads
Kimi K2.7 Code: 39.0 (#61), Qwen-14B: 19.6 (#257)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 149.97 | 113.03 |
| SimpleBench | 57.9% | — |
| CritPt | 10% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 21% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1027 |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 48.8% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 55% |
| LAMBADA | — | 71.1% |
| PIQA | — | 79.9% |
Math Kimi K2.7 Code leads
Kimi K2.7 Code: 52.9 (#48), Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#227)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 54% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 12.2% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 95.6% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1068 |
| GSM8K | — | 61.3% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Kimi K2.7 Code: 53.5 (#57), Qwen-14B: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 87.9% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 36.5% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 84.4% |
| BoolQ | — | 86.2% |
| MMLU | — | 66.3% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Kimi K2.7 Code: —, Qwen-14B: 27.5 (#275)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1041 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1077 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Kimi K2.7 Code: —, Qwen-14B: 52.4 (#289)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1031 |
Long Context Not comparable
Kimi K2.7 Code: —, Qwen-14B: 31.3 (#280)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1028 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Kimi K2.7 Code: —, Qwen-14B: 27.6 (#299)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1051 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1028 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1022 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Kimi K2.7 Code better than Qwen-14B?
Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.3 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Kimi K2.7 Code or Qwen-14B better for coding?
Kimi K2.7 Code scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.9 versus 31.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Kimi K2.7 Code and Qwen-14B share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Kimi K2.7 Code has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen-14B has 18.