Model comparison

Kimi K2.5 Instant vs Mistral

Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Kimi K2.5 Instant Moonshot AI

43.6

Rank #89 Confirmed

Mistral Mistral AI

29.9

Rank #303 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2.5 Instant scores higher in 8 categories and Mistral in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Kimi K2.5 Instant leads 60.6 to 37.0.
  • Kimi K2.5 Instant has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Kimi K2.5 Instant and Mistral specifications
Kimi K2.5 InstantMistral
ProviderMoonshot AIMistral AI
Noometry Index43.629.9
Released——
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1822

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Kimi K2.5 Instant leads

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 42.6 (#97), Mistral: 33.8 (#250)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantMistral
LMArena Coding14841162
LMArena WebDev1404—

Reasoning Kimi K2.5 Instant leads

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 29.7 (#90), Mistral: 22.2 (#200)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantMistral
LMArena Hard Prompts14431149

Math Kimi K2.5 Instant leads

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 39.4 (#105), Mistral: 22.3 (#278)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantMistral
LMArena Math14421180
Omni-MATH—7.2%

Knowledge Kimi K2.5 Instant leads

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 40.2 (#123), Mistral: 16.6 (#288)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantMistral
LMArena Expert14401125
MMLU-Pro—27.7%
GPQA (HELM)—30.3%

Multimodal Not comparable

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 40.2 (#50), Mistral: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantMistral
LMArena Vision1254—

Multilingual Kimi K2.5 Instant leads

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 52.0 (#94), Mistral: 32.8 (#254)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantMistral
LMArena Non-English14061129
LMArena Chinese14491109
LMArena French14031180
LMArena German14131155
LMArena Korean13781032
LMArena Russian14041168
LMArena Spanish14471143
LMArena Japanese—1013

Instruction Following Kimi K2.5 Instant leads

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 75.3 (#65), Mistral: 52.6 (#288)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantMistral
LMArena Instruction Following14301152
IFEval—56.8%

Long Context Kimi K2.5 Instant leads

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 43.9 (#83), Mistral: 35.0 (#245)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantMistral
LMArena Longer Query14351153

Writing & Preference Kimi K2.5 Instant leads

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 60.6 (#95), Mistral: 37.0 (#260)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantMistral
LMArena Text14201165
LMArena Creative Writing13811158
LMArena Multi-Turn14271147
WildBench—66%

Frequently asked questions

Is Kimi K2.5 Instant better than Mistral?

Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Kimi K2.5 Instant or Mistral better for coding?

Kimi K2.5 Instant scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.6 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Kimi K2.5 Instant and Mistral share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2.5 Instant has 18 scored results on Noometry and Mistral has 22.

Related comparisons

Go deeper