Model comparison
Kimi K2.5 Instant vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 43.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2.5 Instant scores higher in 1 category and MiMo-V2.5-Pro in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads 47.4 to 42.6.
Side by side
| Kimi K2.5 Instant | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 43.6 | 45.2 |
| Released | — | 2026-04-22 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.43 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.87 |
| Results tracked | 18 | 27 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 42.6 (#97), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 47.4 (#60)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1404 | 1479 |
| LMArena Coding | 1484 | 1503 |
| SciCode | — | 50.2% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 899.8 |
Reasoning Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 29.7 (#90), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 26.8 (#130)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1443 | 1488 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 34.4% |
| CritPt | — | 4% |
| DTBench | — | 84.5% |
| LMCA | — | 29.5% |
Math Too close to call
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 39.4 (#105), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 40.0 (#96)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1442 | 1481 |
| ProofBench | — | 22% |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 40.2 (#123), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 42.2 (#98)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1440 | 1503 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 40.2 (#50), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1254 | — |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 52.0 (#94), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 55.1 (#34)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1406 | 1449 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1449 | 1507 |
| LMArena French | 1403 | 1488 |
| LMArena German | 1413 | 1458 |
| LMArena Korean | 1378 | 1437 |
| LMArena Russian | 1404 | 1450 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1447 | 1471 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1412 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 75.3 (#65), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 77.5 (#21)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1430 | 1477 |
Long Context MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 43.9 (#83), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 45.4 (#37)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1435 | 1483 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 60.6 (#95), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 65.3 (#49)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1420 | 1465 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1381 | 1440 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1427 | 1477 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1493 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1208 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Kimi K2.5 Instant better than MiMo-V2.5-Pro?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 43.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Kimi K2.5 Instant or MiMo-V2.5-Pro better for coding?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.4 versus 42.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Kimi K2.5 Instant and MiMo-V2.5-Pro share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2.5 Instant has 18 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 27.