Model comparison

Jamba Large vs Muse Spark 1.2

Muse Spark 1.2 has enough public results to be ranked (#44); Jamba Large does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Jamba Large AI21 Labs

32.6

Unranked Sparse

Muse Spark 1.2 Meta

49.8

Rank #44 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Muse Spark 1.2 leads 50.4 to 17.4.
  • Muse Spark 1.2 is cheaper at $1.25 / $4.25 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $8 for Jamba Large.
  • Muse Spark 1.2 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 256K.
  • Jamba Large has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Jamba Large and Muse Spark 1.2 specifications
Jamba LargeMuse Spark 1.2
ProviderAI21 LabsMeta
Noometry Index32.649.8
Released2025-07-012026-08-05
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window256K1.05M
Max output4K131K
Input $ / M tokens$2$1.25
Output $ / M tokens$8$4.25
Results tracked228

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Jamba Large: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 48.6 (#49)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkJamba LargeMuse Spark 1.2
DeepSWE—54.9%
LMArena WebDev—1532
FrontierSWE—12%
SciCode—56.4%
WeirdML—60.3%
LMArena Coding—1497

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Jamba Large: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 29.5 (#77)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkJamba LargeMuse Spark 1.2
APEX-Agents—36.4%
GDP.pdf—16%

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Jamba Large: 17.4, Muse Spark 1.2: 50.4 (#32)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkJamba LargeMuse Spark 1.2
SimpleBench—74.5%
Kagi LLM Benchmark26.1%—
NYT Connections (extended)—79.2%
CritPt—17.7%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1490
DTBench—94.7%
LMCA—48.4%
Epoch Capabilities Index—155.18

Math Not comparable

Jamba Large: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 43.8 (#68)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkJamba LargeMuse Spark 1.2
ProofBench—43%

Knowledge Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Jamba Large: 37.0, Muse Spark 1.2: 53.9 (#49)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkJamba LargeMuse Spark 1.2
SimpleQA Verified—60.3%
Vectara Hallucination Rate9.7%—
LMArena Expert—1485

Multimodal Not comparable

Jamba Large: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 42.6 (#24)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkJamba LargeMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Vision—1304

Multilingual Not comparable

Jamba Large: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 57.4 (#10)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkJamba LargeMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Non-English—1479
LMArena Chinese—1519
LMArena Russian—1494

Instruction Following Not comparable

Jamba Large: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 77.1 (#30)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkJamba LargeMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Instruction Following—1466

Long Context Not comparable

Jamba Large: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 45.4 (#35)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkJamba LargeMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Longer Query—1483

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Jamba Large: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 72.6 (#14)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkJamba LargeMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text—1486
LMArena Creative Writing—1444
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1840
LMArena Multi-Turn—1504

Frequently asked questions

Is Jamba Large better than Muse Spark 1.2?

Muse Spark 1.2 has enough public results to be ranked (#44); Jamba Large does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Which is cheaper, Jamba Large or Muse Spark 1.2?

Muse Spark 1.2 is cheaper. It lists at $1.25 per million input tokens and $4.25 per million output tokens; Jamba Large lists at $2 and $8.

Which has the bigger context window?

Muse Spark 1.2 does, with 1.05M tokens against 256K.

How many benchmarks do Jamba Large and Muse Spark 1.2 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Jamba Large has 2 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.2 has 28.

Related comparisons

Go deeper