Model comparison

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Jamba Large

Claude Sonnet 4.6 has enough public results to be ranked (#42); Jamba Large does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic

50.1

Rank #42 Confirmed

Jamba Large AI21 Labs

32.6

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Claude Sonnet 4.6 scores higher in 2 categories and Jamba Large in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Claude Sonnet 4.6 leads 46.1 to 17.4.
  • Jamba Large is cheaper at $2 / $8 per million input/output tokens, against $3 / $15 for Claude Sonnet 4.6.
  • Claude Sonnet 4.6 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 256K.
  • Jamba Large has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Jamba Large specifications
Claude Sonnet 4.6Jamba Large
ProviderAnthropicAI21 Labs
Noometry Index50.132.6
Released2026-02-172025-07-01
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1M256K
Max output128K4K
Input $ / M tokens$3$2
Output $ / M tokens$15$8
Results tracked572

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 4.6: 46.0 (#62), Jamba Large: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6Jamba Large
SWE-bench Verified75.2%—
DeepSWE29.9%—
FrontierCode24.3%—
LMArena WebDev1521—
SciCode46.8%—
WeirdML66.1%—
LMArena Coding1504—
ALE-Bench1,327—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 4.6: 39.1 (#26), Jamba Large: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6Jamba Large
Terminal-Bench53.4%—
APEX-Agents43%—
OSWorld 2.09.3%—
DeepResearch Bench54.9%—
OSWorld72.1%—
ExploitBench23.6%—
GBAEval48.8%—
GDP.pdf18%—
LMArena Search1221—
Vending-Bench 27,204—

Reasoning Claude Sonnet 4.6 leads

Claude Sonnet 4.6: 46.1 (#40), Jamba Large: 17.4

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6Jamba Large
ARC-AGI-260.4%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark—26.1%
NYT Connections (extended)80.9%—
ARC-AGI-186.5%—
CritPt3.1%—
Chess Puzzles13%—
Thematic Generalization76.3%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1485—
Mystery Game Puzzles16%—
DTBench89.9%—
LMCA46.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index152.25—
ForecastBench62—

Math Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 4.6: 51.9 (#41), Jamba Large: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6Jamba Large
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202585.8%—
ProofBench45%—
LMArena Math1463—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)32.4%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)8.3%—

Knowledge Claude Sonnet 4.6 leads

Claude Sonnet 4.6: 51.6 (#60), Jamba Large: 37.0

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6Jamba Large
Vectara Hallucination Rate10.6%9.7%
GPQA Diamond87.4%—
SimpleQA Verified35.5%—
LMArena Expert1500—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 4.6: 38.0 (#61), Jamba Large: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6Jamba Large
LMArena Vision1283—
Blueprint-Bench 26.7%—
LMArena Document1482—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 4.6: 54.6 (#39), Jamba Large: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6Jamba Large
LMArena Non-English1440—
LMArena Chinese1491—
LMArena French1465—
LMArena German1428—
LMArena Japanese1419—
LMArena Korean1411—
LMArena Russian1440—
LMArena Spanish1465—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 4.6: 77.6 (#23), Jamba Large: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6Jamba Large
LMArena Instruction Following1476—

Long Context Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 4.6: 45.3 (#40), Jamba Large: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6Jamba Large
LMArena Longer Query1479—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 4.6: 70.4 (#22), Jamba Large: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6Jamba Large
LMArena Text1458—
LMArena Creative Writing1435—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1810—
EQ-Bench 41207—
LMArena Multi-Turn1464—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Sonnet 4.6 better than Jamba Large?

Claude Sonnet 4.6 has enough public results to be ranked (#42); Jamba Large does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or Jamba Large?

Jamba Large is cheaper. It lists at $2 per million input tokens and $8 per million output tokens; Claude Sonnet 4.6 lists at $3 and $15.

Which has the bigger context window?

Claude Sonnet 4.6 does, with 1M tokens against 256K.

How many benchmarks do Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Jamba Large share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Claude Sonnet 4.6 has 57 scored results on Noometry and Jamba Large has 2.

Related comparisons

Go deeper