Model comparison
Command R vs Inkling
Inkling is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.1 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index. Command R costs 9.8× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Inkling's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.
CohereSummary
- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 0 categories and Inkling in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Inkling leads 65.2 to 38.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 46.4% for Command R and 87.5% for Inkling.
- Command R is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.60 per million input/output tokens, against $1.87 / $4.68 for Inkling.
- Command R accepts more context: 128K tokens versus 66K.
Side by side
| Command R | Inkling | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Thinking Machines Lab |
| Noometry Index | 31.4 | 44.1 |
| Released | 2024-08-30 | 2026-07-15 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | 66K |
| Max output | 4K | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.15 | $1.87 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.60 | $4.68 |
| Results tracked | 29 | 41 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Inkling leads
Command R: 29.3 (#306), Inkling: 34.5 (#234)
| Benchmark | Command R | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1169 | 1464 |
| FrontierCode | — | 14% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1413 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 4.1% |
| SciCode | — | 47% |
| WeirdML | — | 32.3% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 946 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Command R: —, Inkling: 29.6 (#85)
| Benchmark | Command R | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 33.8% |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 25% |
Reasoning Inkling leads
Command R: 13.8 (#331), Inkling: 40.4 (#56)
| Benchmark | Command R | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | 1451 |
| DTBench | 46.4% | 87.5% |
| LMCA | 9.2% | 37.6% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 36.5% |
| SimpleBench | — | 50% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 79.5% |
| CritPt | — | 5.4% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 21% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 148.54 |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |
Math Inkling leads
Command R: 28.0 (#246), Inkling: 31.3 (#225)
| Benchmark | Command R | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1155 | 1479 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 33.3% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 4.9% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 88.9% |
| ProofBench | — | 0% |
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |
Knowledge Inkling leads
Command R: 31.0 (#221), Inkling: 55.1 (#49)
| Benchmark | Command R | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | 1465 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 88.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 40.3% |
| MMLU | 65.2% | — |
Multilingual Inkling leads
Command R: 35.7 (#245), Inkling: 54.0 (#52)
| Benchmark | Command R | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | 1434 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | 1490 |
| LMArena French | 1162 | 1458 |
| LMArena German | 1176 | 1446 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | 1429 |
| LMArena Korean | 1163 | 1404 |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | 1429 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1151 | 1448 |
Instruction Following Inkling leads
Command R: 58.1 (#261), Inkling: 75.1 (#71)
| Benchmark | Command R | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | 1426 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |
Long Context Inkling leads
Command R: 36.3 (#231), Inkling: 43.8 (#86)
| Benchmark | Command R | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | 1434 |
Writing & Preference Inkling leads
Command R: 38.2 (#254), Inkling: 65.2 (#51)
| Benchmark | Command R | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | 1441 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | 1387 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | 1436 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1611 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1226 |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command R better than Inkling?
Inkling is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.1 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index. Command R costs 9.8× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Inkling's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Command R or Inkling?
Command R is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; Inkling lists at $1.87 and $4.68.
Is Command R or Inkling better for coding?
Inkling scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.5 versus 29.3 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Command R does, with 128K tokens against 66K.
How many benchmarks do Command R and Inkling share?
19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Inkling has 41.