Model comparison

Inkling vs Sonar

Inkling is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.1 to 38.5 on the Noometry Index. Sonar costs 2.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Inkling's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Inkling Thinking Machines Lab

44.1

Rank #80 Confirmed

Sonar Perplexity

38.5

Rank #187 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Inkling leads 40.4 to 21.1.
  • Sonar is cheaper at $1 / $1 per million input/output tokens, against $1.87 / $4.68 for Inkling.
  • Sonar accepts more context: 128K tokens versus 66K.
  • Inkling has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Inkling and Sonar specifications
InklingSonar
ProviderThinking Machines LabPerplexity
Noometry Index44.138.5
Released2026-07-152024-01-01
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window66K128K
Max output66K4K
Input $ / M tokens$1.87$1
Output $ / M tokens$4.68$1
Results tracked417

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Sonar leads

Inkling: 34.5 (#234), Sonar: 35.7 (#221)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingSonar
FrontierCode14%—
LMArena WebDev1413—
FrontierSWE4.1%—
SciCode47%—
WeirdML32.3%—
LiveBench Coding—35.1%
LMArena Coding1464—
ALE-Bench946—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Inkling: 29.6 (#85), Sonar: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingSonar
APEX-Agents33.8%—
τ²-bench Banking25%—

Reasoning Inkling leads

Inkling: 40.4 (#56), Sonar: 21.1 (#227)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingSonar
ARC-AGI-236.5%—
SimpleBench50%—
ARC-AGI-179.5%—
CritPt5.4%—
Chess Puzzles21%—
LiveBench Reasoning—46.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts1451—
DTBench87.5%—
LiveBench Data Analysis—37.9%
LMCA37.6%—
Epoch Capabilities Index148.54—
LiveBench—46.9%

Math Sonar leads

Inkling: 31.3 (#225), Sonar: 33.7 (#200)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingSonar
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)33.3%—
FrontierMath Tier 44.9%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202588.9%—
ProofBench0%—
LiveBench Math—41.6%
LMArena Math1479—

Knowledge Not comparable

Inkling: 55.1 (#49), Sonar: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingSonar
GPQA Diamond88.3%—
SimpleQA Verified40.3%—
LMArena Expert1465—

Multilingual Not comparable

Inkling: 54.0 (#52), Sonar: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingSonar
LMArena Non-English1434—
LMArena Chinese1490—
LMArena French1458—
LMArena German1446—
LMArena Japanese1429—
LMArena Korean1404—
LMArena Russian1429—
LMArena Spanish1448—

Instruction Following Inkling leads

Inkling: 75.1 (#71), Sonar: 71.4 (#150)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingSonar
LiveBench Instruction Following—76.2%
LMArena Instruction Following1426—

Long Context Not comparable

Inkling: 43.8 (#86), Sonar: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingSonar
LMArena Longer Query1434—

Writing & Preference Inkling leads

Inkling: 65.2 (#51), Sonar: 52.6 (#167)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingSonar
LMArena Text1441—
LMArena Creative Writing1387—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1611—
EQ-Bench 41226—
LMArena Multi-Turn1436—
LiveBench Language—44.1%

Frequently asked questions

Is Inkling better than Sonar?

Inkling is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.1 to 38.5 on the Noometry Index. Sonar costs 2.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Inkling's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Inkling or Sonar?

Sonar is cheaper. It lists at $1 per million input tokens and $1 per million output tokens; Inkling lists at $1.87 and $4.68.

Is Inkling or Sonar better for coding?

Sonar scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.7 versus 34.5 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Sonar does, with 128K tokens against 66K.

How many benchmarks do Inkling and Sonar share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Inkling has 41 scored results on Noometry and Sonar has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper