Model comparison

Inkling-Small vs Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct

Inkling-Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.5 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Inkling-Small scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Inkling-Small leads 38.6 to 25.5.
  • Inkling-Small is cheaper at $0.45 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens, against $1.50 / $7.50 for Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct.
  • Inkling-Small accepts more context: 524K tokens versus 262K.

Side by side

Inkling-Small and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct specifications
Inkling-SmallQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
ProviderThinking Machines LabAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index46.538.1
Released2026-07-152025-04
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window524K262K
Max output1.05M66K
Input $ / M tokens$0.45$1.50
Output $ / M tokens$1.20$7.50
Results tracked3325

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Inkling-Small leads

Inkling-Small: 43.6 (#85), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 35.5 (#223)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-SmallQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena WebDev14091275
LMArena Coding14511412
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—55.4%
SciCode48.7%—
GSO—4.9%
WeirdML—41.2%
ALE-Bench—461.45
AlgoTune—1.44

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Inkling-Small: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 23.9 (#123)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-SmallQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
Terminal-Bench—27.2%

Reasoning Inkling-Small leads

Inkling-Small: 38.6 (#63), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 25.5 (#149)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-SmallQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14231372
ARC-AGI-240.1%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark—49.5%
ARC-AGI-184%—
CritPt8.3%—
Chess Puzzles18%—
Mystery Game Puzzles6%—
Epoch Capabilities Index150.15—

Math Inkling-Small leads

Inkling-Small: 45.1 (#77), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 37.6 (#150)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-SmallQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Math14591365
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)46.3%—
FrontierMath Tier 417.1%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202590%—
ProofBench6%—

Knowledge Inkling-Small leads

Inkling-Small: 48.2 (#77), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 37.0 (#162)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-SmallQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Expert14421338
GPQA Diamond88.5%—
SimpleQA Verified19.1%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Inkling-Small: 39.1 (#62), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-SmallQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Vision1235—

Multilingual Inkling-Small leads

Inkling-Small: 51.7 (#104), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 47.7 (#148)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-SmallQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Non-English14021346
LMArena Chinese14651357
LMArena French14361398
LMArena German14051325
LMArena Japanese14051310
LMArena Korean13631305
LMArena Russian13911366
LMArena Spanish14281360

Instruction Following Inkling-Small leads

Inkling-Small: 73.8 (#114), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 71.6 (#147)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-SmallQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following13991355

Long Context Too close to call

Inkling-Small: 42.7 (#118), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 42.0 (#131)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-SmallQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Longer Query14011378

Writing & Preference Inkling-Small leads

Inkling-Small: 59.6 (#107), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 55.3 (#147)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-SmallQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Text14141357
LMArena Creative Writing13311333
LMArena Multi-Turn14181365
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1491—

Frequently asked questions

Is Inkling-Small better than Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

Inkling-Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.5 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Inkling-Small or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

Inkling-Small is cheaper. It lists at $0.45 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct lists at $1.50 and $7.50.

Is Inkling-Small or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct better for coding?

Inkling-Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.6 versus 35.5 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Inkling-Small does, with 524K tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do Inkling-Small and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Inkling-Small has 33 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has 25.

Related comparisons

Go deeper