Model comparison
Inkling-Small vs Qwen Turbo
Inkling-Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.5 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index. Qwen Turbo costs 7.3× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Inkling-Small's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Inkling-Small scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen Turbo in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Inkling-Small leads 45.1 to 15.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 90% for Inkling-Small and 6.1% for Qwen Turbo.
- Qwen Turbo is cheaper at $0.05 / $0.20 per million input/output tokens, against $0.45 / $1.20 for Inkling-Small.
- Qwen Turbo accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 524K.
- Inkling-Small has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Inkling-Small | Qwen Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Thinking Machines Lab | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 46.5 | 27.1 |
| Released | 2026-07-15 | 2024-11-01 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 524K | 1M |
| Max output | 1.05M | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.45 | $0.05 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.20 | $0.20 |
| Results tracked | 33 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Inkling-Small: 43.6 (#85), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1409 | — |
| SciCode | 48.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1451 | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Inkling-Small: 38.6 (#63), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 40.1% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 84% | — |
| CritPt | 8.3% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 18% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1423 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 150.15 | — |
Math Inkling-Small leads
Inkling-Small: 45.1 (#77), Qwen Turbo: 15.3 (#297)
| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 90% | 6.1% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 46.3% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 17.1% | — |
| ProofBench | 6% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1459 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 56.2% |
Knowledge Inkling-Small leads
Inkling-Small: 48.2 (#77), Qwen Turbo: 22.2 (#272)
| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 88.5% | 41.8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 19.1% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1442 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Inkling-Small: 39.1 (#62), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1235 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Inkling-Small: 51.7 (#104), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1402 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1465 | — |
| LMArena French | 1436 | — |
| LMArena German | 1405 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1405 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1363 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1391 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1428 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Inkling-Small: 73.8 (#114), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1399 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Inkling-Small: 42.7 (#118), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1401 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Inkling-Small: 59.6 (#107), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1414 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1331 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1491 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1418 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Inkling-Small better than Qwen Turbo?
Inkling-Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.5 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index. Qwen Turbo costs 7.3× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Inkling-Small's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Inkling-Small or Qwen Turbo?
Qwen Turbo is cheaper. It lists at $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens; Inkling-Small lists at $0.45 and $1.20.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen Turbo does, with 1M tokens against 524K.
How many benchmarks do Inkling-Small and Qwen Turbo share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Inkling-Small has 33 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Turbo has 3.