Model comparison

Inkling-Small vs Llama 2-7B

Inkling-Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.5 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Inkling-Small Thinking Machines Lab

46.5

Rank #57 Confirmed

Llama 2-7B Meta

28.6

Rank #315 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Inkling-Small scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 2-7B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Inkling-Small leads 59.8 to 28.1.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Chess Puzzles: 18% for Inkling-Small and 0% for Llama 2-7B.

Side by side

Inkling-Small and Llama 2-7B specifications
Inkling-SmallLlama 2-7B
ProviderThinking Machines LabMeta
Noometry Index46.528.6
Released2026-07-152023-07-18
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window524K—
Max output1.05M—
Input $ / M tokens$0.45—
Output $ / M tokens$1.20—
Results tracked3329

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Inkling-Small leads

Inkling-Small: 43.3 (#80), Llama 2-7B: 28.7 (#302)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-SmallLlama 2-7B
LMArena Coding14511002
LMArena WebDev1408—
SciCode48.7%—

Reasoning Inkling-Small leads

Inkling-Small: 39.0 (#53), Llama 2-7B: 15.1 (#309)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-SmallLlama 2-7B
Chess Puzzles18%0%
LMArena Hard Prompts14241009
Epoch Capabilities Index150.1398.54
ARC-AGI-240.1%—
ARC-AGI-184%—
CritPt8.3%—
Mystery Game Puzzles6%—
BIG-Bench Hard—39.2%
HellaSwag—77.2%
LAMBADA—73.3%
PIQA—78.8%
WinoGrande—69.2%

Math Inkling-Small leads

Inkling-Small: 44.9 (#65), Llama 2-7B: 28.2 (#231)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-SmallLlama 2-7B
LMArena Math14531042
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)46.3%—
FrontierMath Tier 417.1%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202590%—
ProofBench6%—
GSM8K—16.7%

Knowledge Inkling-Small leads

Inkling-Small: 48.3 (#71), Llama 2-7B: 27.7 (#243)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-SmallLlama 2-7B
LMArena Expert14421036
GPQA Diamond88.5%—
SimpleQA Verified19.1%—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—45.9%
BoolQ—77.9%
MMLU—45.8%
OpenBookQA—58.6%
TriviaQA—73.7%

Multimodal Not comparable

Inkling-Small: 38.4 (#59), Llama 2-7B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-SmallLlama 2-7B
LMArena Vision1235—
ScienceQA—43.1%

Multilingual Inkling-Small leads

Inkling-Small: 51.7 (#102), Llama 2-7B: 23.9 (#288)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-SmallLlama 2-7B
LMArena Non-English1400973
LMArena Chinese1458973
LMArena French1438969
LMArena German1412978
LMArena Russian1392995
LMArena Spanish14261007
LMArena Japanese1399—
LMArena Korean1355—

Instruction Following Inkling-Small leads

Inkling-Small: 73.9 (#112), Llama 2-7B: 51.0 (#293)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-SmallLlama 2-7B
LMArena Instruction Following13971006

Long Context Inkling-Small leads

Inkling-Small: 42.7 (#113), Llama 2-7B: 30.4 (#282)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-SmallLlama 2-7B
LMArena Longer Query1401999

Writing & Preference Inkling-Small leads

Inkling-Small: 59.8 (#102), Llama 2-7B: 28.1 (#293)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-SmallLlama 2-7B
LMArena Text14131053
LMArena Creative Writing13301033
LMArena Multi-Turn14201029
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1491—

Frequently asked questions

Is Inkling-Small better than Llama 2-7B?

Inkling-Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.5 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Inkling-Small or Llama 2-7B better for coding?

Inkling-Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.3 versus 28.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Inkling-Small and Llama 2-7B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Inkling-Small has 33 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-7B has 29.

Related comparisons

Go deeper