Model comparison
Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs Inkling-Small
Inkling-Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.5 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 2b IT scores higher in 0 categories and Inkling-Small in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Inkling-Small leads 59.6 to 25.1.
Side by side
| Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Inkling-Small | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Thinking Machines Lab | |
| Noometry Index | 29.3 | 46.5 |
| Released | — | 2026-07-15 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 524K |
| Max output | — | 1.05M |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.45 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 33 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Inkling-Small leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.1 (#299), Inkling-Small: 43.6 (#85)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1034 | 1451 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1409 |
| SciCode | — | 48.7% |
| HumanEval+ | 17.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 23.3% | — |
Reasoning Inkling-Small leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 19.1 (#270), Inkling-Small: 38.6 (#63)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | 1423 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 40.1% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 84% |
| CritPt | — | 8.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 18% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 150.15 |
Math Inkling-Small leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.8 (#232), Inkling-Small: 45.1 (#77)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1047 | 1459 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 46.3% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 17.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 90% |
| ProofBench | — | 6% |
Knowledge Inkling-Small leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.5 (#258), Inkling-Small: 48.2 (#77)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 970 | 1442 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 88.5% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 19.1% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: —, Inkling-Small: 39.1 (#62)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1235 |
Multilingual Inkling-Small leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.6 (#289), Inkling-Small: 51.7 (#104)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 988 | 1402 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1012 | 1465 |
| LMArena German | 944 | 1405 |
| LMArena Korean | 899 | 1363 |
| LMArena Russian | 990 | 1391 |
| LMArena French | — | 1436 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1405 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1428 |
Instruction Following Inkling-Small leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 49.9 (#299), Inkling-Small: 73.8 (#114)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 992 | 1399 |
Long Context Inkling-Small leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.6 (#286), Inkling-Small: 42.7 (#118)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1003 | 1401 |
Writing & Preference Inkling-Small leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.1 (#306), Inkling-Small: 59.6 (#107)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1022 | 1414 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 998 | 1331 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 959 | 1418 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1491 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than Inkling-Small?
Inkling-Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.5 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT or Inkling-Small better for coding?
Inkling-Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.6 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Inkling-Small share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and Inkling-Small has 33.