Model comparison

Granite 4.0 H Small vs Qwen3.6 Plus

Qwen3.6 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.5 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.0 H Small IBM

36.5

Rank #214 Confirmed

Qwen3.6 Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

47.5

Rank #62 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.0 H Small scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.6 Plus in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.6 Plus leads 56.1 to 32.0.
  • Granite 4.0 H Small has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Granite 4.0 H Small and Qwen3.6 Plus specifications
Granite 4.0 H SmallQwen3.6 Plus
ProviderIBMAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index36.547.5
Released—2026-03-31
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.50
Output $ / M tokens—$3
Results tracked1937

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Granite 4.0 H Small: 36.4 (#209), Qwen3.6 Plus: 40.8 (#130)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 H SmallQwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Coding12491467
SWE-bench Verified—57.9%
LMArena WebDev—1461
SciCode—40.7%
ALE-Bench—670.15

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 4.0 H Small: —, Qwen3.6 Plus: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 H SmallQwen3.6 Plus
Vending-Bench 2—5,115

Reasoning Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Granite 4.0 H Small: 24.4 (#163), Qwen3.6 Plus: 29.3 (#93)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 H SmallQwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Hard Prompts12401449
NYT Connections (extended)—60.3%
CritPt—2.9%
Chess Puzzles—17%
Thematic Generalization—59.5%
Mystery Game Puzzles—12%
DTBench—81.9%
LMCA—33.1%
Epoch Capabilities Index—147.65

Math Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Granite 4.0 H Small: 31.4 (#223), Qwen3.6 Plus: 51.8 (#54)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 H SmallQwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Math12471450
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—38.2%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—93.3%
Omni-MATH29.6%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—26.2%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—8.3%

Knowledge Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Granite 4.0 H Small: 32.0 (#215), Qwen3.6 Plus: 56.1 (#45)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 H SmallQwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Expert12511454
GPQA Diamond—88.4%
SimpleQA Verified—44.1%
MMLU-Pro56.9%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.2%—
GPQA (HELM)38.3%—

Multilingual Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Granite 4.0 H Small: 38.6 (#228), Qwen3.6 Plus: 53.3 (#70)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 H SmallQwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Non-English12161424
LMArena Chinese12491477
LMArena Russian12011434
LMArena Spanish12581432
LMArena French—1455
LMArena German—1452
LMArena Japanese—1389
LMArena Korean—1379

Instruction Following Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Granite 4.0 H Small: 68.7 (#183), Qwen3.6 Plus: 75.0 (#74)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 H SmallQwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Instruction Following12221425
IFEval89%—

Long Context Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Granite 4.0 H Small: 37.7 (#213), Qwen3.6 Plus: 45.2 (#49)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 H SmallQwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Longer Query12421439
CL-bench—20.3%

Writing & Preference Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Granite 4.0 H Small: 43.8 (#227), Qwen3.6 Plus: 62.2 (#82)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 H SmallQwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Text12411437
LMArena Creative Writing12111404
LMArena Multi-Turn12421438
WildBench73.9%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.0 H Small better than Qwen3.6 Plus?

Qwen3.6 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.5 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 4.0 H Small or Qwen3.6 Plus better for coding?

Qwen3.6 Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.8 versus 36.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.0 H Small and Qwen3.6 Plus share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.0 H Small has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Plus has 37.

Related comparisons

Go deeper