Model comparison

Granite 4.0 H Small vs Inkling-Small

Inkling-Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.5 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.0 H Small IBM

36.5

Rank #214 Confirmed

Inkling-Small Thinking Machines Lab

46.5

Rank #63 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.0 H Small scores higher in 0 categories and Inkling-Small in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Inkling-Small leads 48.2 to 32.0.

Side by side

Granite 4.0 H Small and Inkling-Small specifications
Granite 4.0 H SmallInkling-Small
ProviderIBMThinking Machines Lab
Noometry Index36.546.5
Released—2026-07-15
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—524K
Max output—1.05M
Input $ / M tokens—$0.45
Output $ / M tokens—$1.20
Results tracked1933

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Inkling-Small leads

Granite 4.0 H Small: 36.4 (#209), Inkling-Small: 43.6 (#85)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 H SmallInkling-Small
LMArena Coding12491451
LMArena WebDev—1409
SciCode—48.7%

Reasoning Inkling-Small leads

Granite 4.0 H Small: 24.4 (#163), Inkling-Small: 38.6 (#63)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 H SmallInkling-Small
LMArena Hard Prompts12401423
ARC-AGI-2—40.1%
ARC-AGI-1—84%
CritPt—8.3%
Chess Puzzles—18%
Mystery Game Puzzles—6%
Epoch Capabilities Index—150.15

Math Inkling-Small leads

Granite 4.0 H Small: 31.4 (#223), Inkling-Small: 45.1 (#77)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 H SmallInkling-Small
LMArena Math12471459
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—46.3%
FrontierMath Tier 4—17.1%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—90%
ProofBench—6%
Omni-MATH29.6%—

Knowledge Inkling-Small leads

Granite 4.0 H Small: 32.0 (#215), Inkling-Small: 48.2 (#77)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 H SmallInkling-Small
LMArena Expert12511442
GPQA Diamond—88.5%
SimpleQA Verified—19.1%
MMLU-Pro56.9%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.2%—
GPQA (HELM)38.3%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Granite 4.0 H Small: —, Inkling-Small: 39.1 (#62)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 H SmallInkling-Small
LMArena Vision—1235

Multilingual Inkling-Small leads

Granite 4.0 H Small: 38.6 (#228), Inkling-Small: 51.7 (#104)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 H SmallInkling-Small
LMArena Non-English12161402
LMArena Chinese12491465
LMArena Russian12011391
LMArena Spanish12581428
LMArena French—1436
LMArena German—1405
LMArena Japanese—1405
LMArena Korean—1363

Instruction Following Inkling-Small leads

Granite 4.0 H Small: 68.7 (#183), Inkling-Small: 73.8 (#114)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 H SmallInkling-Small
LMArena Instruction Following12221399
IFEval89%—

Long Context Inkling-Small leads

Granite 4.0 H Small: 37.7 (#213), Inkling-Small: 42.7 (#118)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 H SmallInkling-Small
LMArena Longer Query12421401

Writing & Preference Inkling-Small leads

Granite 4.0 H Small: 43.8 (#227), Inkling-Small: 59.6 (#107)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 H SmallInkling-Small
LMArena Text12411414
LMArena Creative Writing12111331
LMArena Multi-Turn12421418
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1491
WildBench73.9%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.0 H Small better than Inkling-Small?

Inkling-Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.5 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 4.0 H Small or Inkling-Small better for coding?

Inkling-Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.6 versus 36.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.0 H Small and Inkling-Small share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.0 H Small has 19 scored results on Noometry and Inkling-Small has 33.

Related comparisons

Go deeper