Model comparison

Granite 4.0 H Small vs Phi-4

Granite 4.0 H Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.0 H Small IBM

36.5

Rank #214 Confirmed

Phi-4 Microsoft

31.2

Rank #279 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.0 H Small scores higher in 7 categories and Phi-4 in 1 category; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Granite 4.0 H Small leads 31.4 to 20.8.

Side by side

Granite 4.0 H Small and Phi-4 specifications
Granite 4.0 H SmallPhi-4
ProviderIBMMicrosoft
Noometry Index36.531.2
Released—2024-12-11
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—128K
Max output—4K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.07
Output $ / M tokens—$0.14
Results tracked1937

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Granite 4.0 H Small leads

Granite 4.0 H Small: 36.4 (#209), Phi-4: 34.4 (#239)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 H SmallPhi-4
LMArena Coding12491231
BigCodeBench Instruct—45.5%
LiveBench Coding—30.7%
BigCodeBench Complete—55.4%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 4.0 H Small: —, Phi-4: 22.8 (#128)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 H SmallPhi-4
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—28.8%
BALROG—11.6%

Reasoning Granite 4.0 H Small leads

Granite 4.0 H Small: 24.4 (#163), Phi-4: 17.7 (#291)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 H SmallPhi-4
LMArena Hard Prompts12401220
Chess Puzzles—1%
LiveBench Reasoning—47.8%
LiveBench Data Analysis—45.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index—130.42
LiveBench—41.6%

Math Granite 4.0 H Small leads

Granite 4.0 H Small: 31.4 (#223), Phi-4: 20.8 (#285)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 H SmallPhi-4
LMArena Math12471246
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—13.8%
Omni-MATH29.6%—
LiveBench Math—42%
MATH Level 5—64.9%

Knowledge Too close to call

Granite 4.0 H Small: 32.0 (#215), Phi-4: 32.6 (#209)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 H SmallPhi-4
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.2%3.7%
LMArena Expert12511203
GPQA Diamond—56.1%
MMLU-Pro56.9%—
Confabulations—29.4%
GPQA (HELM)38.3%—
MMLU—84.8%

Multilingual Granite 4.0 H Small leads

Granite 4.0 H Small: 38.6 (#228), Phi-4: 37.2 (#237)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 H SmallPhi-4
LMArena Non-English12161197
LMArena Chinese12491212
LMArena Russian12011209
LMArena Spanish12581234
LMArena French—1224
LMArena German—1222
LMArena Japanese—1158
LMArena Korean—1151

Instruction Following Granite 4.0 H Small leads

Granite 4.0 H Small: 68.7 (#183), Phi-4: 60.4 (#251)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 H SmallPhi-4
LMArena Instruction Following12221201
LiveBench Instruction Following—58.4%
IFEval89%—

Long Context Too close to call

Granite 4.0 H Small: 37.7 (#213), Phi-4: 36.9 (#226)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 H SmallPhi-4
LMArena Longer Query12421217

Writing & Preference Granite 4.0 H Small leads

Granite 4.0 H Small: 43.8 (#227), Phi-4: 40.5 (#244)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 H SmallPhi-4
LMArena Text12411217
LMArena Creative Writing12111182
LMArena Multi-Turn12421206
Short-Story Creative Writing—62.6%
WildBench73.9%—
LiveBench Language—25.6%

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.0 H Small better than Phi-4?

Granite 4.0 H Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 4.0 H Small or Phi-4 better for coding?

Granite 4.0 H Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.4 versus 34.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.0 H Small and Phi-4 share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.0 H Small has 19 scored results on Noometry and Phi-4 has 37.

Related comparisons

Go deeper