Model comparison
Granite 4.0 H Small vs Muse Glimmer
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.0 H Small scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Glimmer in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Muse Glimmer leads 57.7 to 44.0.
Side by side
| Granite 4.0 H Small | Muse Glimmer | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 41.3 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Muse Glimmer leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 35.8 (#207), Muse Glimmer: 38.7 (#157)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1247 | 1417 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1355 |
Reasoning Muse Glimmer leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 23.4 (#164), Muse Glimmer: 27.2 (#111)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1240 | 1395 |
Math Muse Glimmer leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 29.3 (#219), Muse Glimmer: 36.1 (#128)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | 1419 |
| Omni-MATH | 29.6% | — |
Knowledge Muse Glimmer leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 31.5 (#210), Muse Glimmer: 37.9 (#140)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1244 | 1388 |
| MMLU-Pro | 56.9% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.2% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 38.3% | — |
Multilingual Muse Glimmer leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 38.7 (#223), Muse Glimmer: 50.6 (#117)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | 1384 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1250 | 1412 |
| LMArena Russian | 1198 | 1393 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1258 | — |
Instruction Following Muse Glimmer leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 68.9 (#178), Muse Glimmer: 72.7 (#134)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1221 | 1374 |
| IFEval | 89% | — |
Long Context Muse Glimmer leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 37.6 (#209), Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#124)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1240 | 1381 |
Writing & Preference Muse Glimmer leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 44.0 (#222), Muse Glimmer: 57.7 (#122)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1241 | 1389 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1210 | 1338 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1243 | 1398 |
| WildBench | 73.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Granite 4.0 H Small better than Muse Glimmer?
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Granite 4.0 H Small or Muse Glimmer better for coding?
Muse Glimmer scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.7 versus 35.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Granite 4.0 H Small and Muse Glimmer share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.0 H Small has 19 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 13.