Model comparison
Command A vs Muse Glimmer
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
MetaSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Glimmer in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Muse Glimmer leads 38.7 to 26.8.
Side by side
| Command A | Muse Glimmer | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 41.3 |
| Released | 2025-03-13 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 256K | — |
| Max output | 8K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Results tracked | 24 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Muse Glimmer leads
Command A: 26.8 (#317), Muse Glimmer: 38.7 (#157)
| Benchmark | Command A | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1331 | 1417 |
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1355 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Command A: 35.7 (#36), Muse Glimmer: —
| Benchmark | Command A | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | — |
Reasoning Muse Glimmer leads
Command A: 17.7 (#276), Muse Glimmer: 27.2 (#111)
| Benchmark | Command A | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | 1395 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | — |
| DTBench | 61.3% | — |
| LMCA | 10.3% | — |
Math Muse Glimmer leads
Command A: 33.5 (#172), Muse Glimmer: 36.1 (#128)
| Benchmark | Command A | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1300 | 1419 |
Knowledge Muse Glimmer leads
Command A: 36.5 (#157), Muse Glimmer: 37.9 (#140)
| Benchmark | Command A | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | 1388 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |
Multilingual Muse Glimmer leads
Command A: 45.5 (#166), Muse Glimmer: 50.6 (#117)
| Benchmark | Command A | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | 1384 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | 1412 |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | 1393 |
| LMArena French | 1352 | — |
| LMArena German | 1341 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1283 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1346 | — |
Instruction Following Muse Glimmer leads
Command A: 69.3 (#172), Muse Glimmer: 72.7 (#134)
| Benchmark | Command A | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | 1374 |
Long Context Muse Glimmer leads
Command A: 40.6 (#147), Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#124)
| Benchmark | Command A | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | 1381 |
Writing & Preference Muse Glimmer leads
Command A: 47.8 (#204), Muse Glimmer: 57.7 (#122)
| Benchmark | Command A | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | 1389 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1338 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1338 | 1398 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command A better than Muse Glimmer?
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Command A or Muse Glimmer better for coding?
Muse Glimmer scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.7 versus 26.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Command A and Muse Glimmer share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 13.