Model comparison
Granite 4.0 H Small vs Mistral Nemo
Granite 4.0 H Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AISummary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Granite 4.0 H Small leads 32.0 to 12.3.
Side by side
| Granite 4.0 H Small | Mistral Nemo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 36.5 | 26.4 |
| Released | — | 2024-07-01 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.15 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.15 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Granite 4.0 H Small: 36.4 (#209), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1249 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Granite 4.0 H Small: —, Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#125)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 27.6% |
| BALROG | — | 17.6% |
Reasoning Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 24.4 (#163), Mistral Nemo: 20.7 (#232)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1240 | — |
| DTBench | — | 48.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 118.68 |
| PIQA | — | 83.5% |
Math Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 31.4 (#223), Mistral Nemo: 25.5 (#268)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 29.6% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1247 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 10.8% |
| GSM8K | — | 84.2% |
Knowledge Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 32.0 (#215), Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#298)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 29.9% |
| MMLU-Pro | 56.9% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.2% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 38.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1251 | — |
| BoolQ | — | 82.5% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Granite 4.0 H Small: 38.6 (#228), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1249 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1201 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1258 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Granite 4.0 H Small: 68.7 (#183), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 89% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1222 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Granite 4.0 H Small: 37.7 (#213), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1242 | — |
Writing & Preference Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 43.8 (#227), Mistral Nemo: 28.5 (#296)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1241 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1211 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 881 |
| WildBench | 73.9% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1242 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Granite 4.0 H Small better than Mistral Nemo?
Granite 4.0 H Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Granite 4.0 H Small and Mistral Nemo share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.0 H Small has 19 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Nemo has 10.