Model comparison
Granite 4.0 H Small vs Ministral 3B
Granite 4.0 H Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 26.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AISummary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Granite 4.0 H Small scores higher in 3 categories and Ministral 3B in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Granite 4.0 H Small leads 32.0 to 10.4.
Side by side
| Granite 4.0 H Small | Ministral 3B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 36.5 | 26.2 |
| Released | — | 2024-10-01 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 262K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.10 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.10 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Granite 4.0 H Small: 36.4 (#209), Ministral 3B: —
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1249 | — |
Reasoning Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 24.4 (#163), Ministral 3B: 18.4 (#282)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1240 | — |
| DTBench | — | 51.7% |
| LMCA | — | 5.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 118.1 |
Math Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 31.4 (#223), Ministral 3B: 26.6 (#258)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 29.6% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1247 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 14.4% |
Knowledge Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 32.0 (#215), Ministral 3B: 10.4 (#302)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.2% | 7.3% |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 25.3% |
| MMLU-Pro | 56.9% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 38.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1251 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Granite 4.0 H Small: 38.6 (#228), Ministral 3B: —
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1249 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1201 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1258 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Granite 4.0 H Small: 68.7 (#183), Ministral 3B: —
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 89% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1222 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Granite 4.0 H Small: 37.7 (#213), Ministral 3B: —
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1242 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Granite 4.0 H Small: 43.8 (#227), Ministral 3B: —
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1241 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1211 | — |
| WildBench | 73.9% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1242 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Granite 4.0 H Small better than Ministral 3B?
Granite 4.0 H Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 26.2 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Granite 4.0 H Small and Ministral 3B share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Granite 4.0 H Small has 19 scored results on Noometry and Ministral 3B has 6.