Model comparison
Granite 4.0 H Small vs MiMo-V2-Pro
MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.0 H Small scores higher in 1 category and MiMo-V2-Pro in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Pro leads 62.8 to 43.8.
- Granite 4.0 H Small has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Granite 4.0 H Small | MiMo-V2-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 36.5 | 43.0 |
| Released | — | 2026-03-18 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.43 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.87 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 36.4 (#209), MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.8 (#83)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1249 | 1476 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1433 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 785.17 |
Reasoning Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 24.4 (#163), MiMo-V2-Pro: 22.1 (#206)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1240 | 1457 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 25.8% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 45.9% |
Math MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 31.4 (#223), MiMo-V2-Pro: 39.5 (#102)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1247 | 1447 |
| Omni-MATH | 29.6% | — |
Knowledge MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 32.0 (#215), MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.4 (#111)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1251 | 1478 |
| MMLU-Pro | 56.9% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.2% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 38.3% | — |
Multilingual MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 38.6 (#228), MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.7 (#81)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | 1416 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1249 | 1456 |
| LMArena Russian | 1201 | 1427 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1258 | 1457 |
| LMArena French | — | 1469 |
| LMArena German | — | 1417 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1366 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1400 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 68.7 (#183), MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.0 (#49)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1222 | 1445 |
| IFEval | 89% | — |
Long Context MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 37.7 (#213), MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#138)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1242 | 1455 |
| CL-bench | — | 15.7% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 6.9% |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 43.8 (#227), MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.8 (#70)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1241 | 1436 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1211 | 1415 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1242 | 1456 |
| WildBench | 73.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Granite 4.0 H Small better than MiMo-V2-Pro?
MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Granite 4.0 H Small or MiMo-V2-Pro better for coding?
MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.8 versus 36.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Granite 4.0 H Small and MiMo-V2-Pro share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.0 H Small has 19 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Pro has 23.