Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 vs Granite 4.0 H Small

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.0 H Small IBM

35.9

Rank #213 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 scores higher in 8 categories and Granite 4.0 H Small in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads 59.7 to 44.0.
  • Granite 4.0 H Small has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 and Granite 4.0 H Small specifications
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Granite 4.0 H Small
ProviderAmazonIBM
Noometry Index42.335.9
Released——
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1219

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 41.5 (#112), Granite 4.0 H Small: 35.8 (#207)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Granite 4.0 H Small
LMArena Coding14301247

Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 28.1 (#93), Granite 4.0 H Small: 23.4 (#164)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Granite 4.0 H Small
LMArena Hard Prompts14271240

Math Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 36.1 (#130), Granite 4.0 H Small: 29.3 (#219)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Granite 4.0 H Small
LMArena Math14181251
Omni-MATH—29.6%

Knowledge Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 38.6 (#133), Granite 4.0 H Small: 31.5 (#210)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Granite 4.0 H Small
LMArena Expert14091244
MMLU-Pro—56.9%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—5.2%
GPQA (HELM)—38.3%

Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 51.7 (#103), Granite 4.0 H Small: 38.7 (#223)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Granite 4.0 H Small
LMArena Non-English13991216
LMArena Chinese14401250
LMArena Russian13971198
LMArena Spanish—1258

Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 73.4 (#117), Granite 4.0 H Small: 68.9 (#178)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Granite 4.0 H Small
LMArena Instruction Following13871221
IFEval—89%

Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 42.4 (#120), Granite 4.0 H Small: 37.6 (#209)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Granite 4.0 H Small
LMArena Longer Query13911240

Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 59.7 (#104), Granite 4.0 H Small: 44.0 (#222)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Granite 4.0 H Small
LMArena Text14201241
LMArena Creative Writing13511210
LMArena Multi-Turn14091243
WildBench—73.9%

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 better than Granite 4.0 H Small?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 or Granite 4.0 H Small better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.5 versus 35.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 and Granite 4.0 H Small share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.0 H Small has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper