Model comparison
Granite 4.0 H Small vs MiMo-V2-Flash
MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.0 H Small scores higher in 1 category and MiMo-V2-Flash in 7 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Flash leads 59.7 to 43.8.
Side by side
| Granite 4.0 H Small | MiMo-V2-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 36.5 | 41.3 |
| Released | — | 2025-12-16 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Granite 4.0 H Small: 36.4 (#209), MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1249 | 1443 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1330 |
| SciCode | — | 25.9% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 737.95 |
Reasoning Too close to call
Granite 4.0 H Small: 24.4 (#163), MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1240 | 1420 |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
Math MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 31.4 (#223), MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1247 | 1396 |
| Omni-MATH | 29.6% | — |
Knowledge MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 32.0 (#215), MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1251 | 1425 |
| MMLU-Pro | 56.9% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.2% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 38.3% | — |
Multilingual MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 38.6 (#228), MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | 1392 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1249 | 1462 |
| LMArena Russian | 1201 | 1387 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1258 | 1420 |
| LMArena French | — | 1429 |
| LMArena German | — | 1395 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1325 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1358 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 68.7 (#183), MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1222 | 1392 |
| IFEval | 89% | — |
Long Context MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 37.7 (#213), MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1242 | 1409 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 43.8 (#227), MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1241 | 1411 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1211 | 1375 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1242 | 1404 |
| WildBench | 73.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Granite 4.0 H Small better than MiMo-V2-Flash?
MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Granite 4.0 H Small or MiMo-V2-Flash better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (36.4 vs 36.1); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Granite 4.0 H Small and MiMo-V2-Flash share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.0 H Small has 19 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Flash has 21.