Model comparison
GLM-4.6V vs Granite 4.0 H Small
GLM-4.6V is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.6V scores higher in 7 categories and Granite 4.0 H Small in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-4.6V leads 56.6 to 43.8.
Side by side
| GLM-4.6V | Granite 4.0 H Small | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | IBM |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 36.5 |
| Released | 2025-12-08 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 33K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.90 | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 40.9 (#128), Granite 4.0 H Small: 36.4 (#209)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1390 | 1249 |
Reasoning GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 27.6 (#115), Granite 4.0 H Small: 24.4 (#163)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1368 | 1240 |
Math Not comparable
GLM-4.6V: —, Granite 4.0 H Small: 31.4 (#223)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | — | 29.6% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1247 |
Knowledge GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 38.0 (#149), Granite 4.0 H Small: 32.0 (#215)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1371 | 1251 |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 56.9% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.2% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 38.3% |
Multimodal Not comparable
GLM-4.6V: 34.8 (#90), Granite 4.0 H Small: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1164 | — |
Multilingual GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 48.6 (#141), Granite 4.0 H Small: 38.6 (#228)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1359 | 1216 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1425 | 1249 |
| LMArena Russian | 1340 | 1201 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1258 |
Instruction Following GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 71.4 (#151), Granite 4.0 H Small: 68.7 (#183)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1352 | 1222 |
| IFEval | — | 89% |
Long Context GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 41.3 (#143), Granite 4.0 H Small: 37.7 (#213)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1358 | 1242 |
Writing & Preference GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 56.6 (#137), Granite 4.0 H Small: 43.8 (#227)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1377 | 1241 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1347 | 1211 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1360 | 1242 |
| WildBench | — | 73.9% |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-4.6V better than Granite 4.0 H Small?
GLM-4.6V is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is GLM-4.6V or Granite 4.0 H Small better for coding?
GLM-4.6V scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.9 versus 36.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GLM-4.6V and Granite 4.0 H Small share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.6V has 12 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.0 H Small has 19.