Model comparison
Granite 4.0 H Small vs Llama 2-70B
Granite 4.0 H Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 24.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.0 H Small scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 2-70B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Granite 4.0 H Small leads 31.5 to 7.4.
Side by side
| Granite 4.0 H Small | Llama 2-70B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 24.1 |
| Released | — | 2023-07-18 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 35 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 35.8 (#207), Llama 2-70B: 30.8 (#281)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1247 | 1079 |
Reasoning Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 23.4 (#164), Llama 2-70B: 13.7 (#324)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1240 | 1073 |
| DTBench | — | 41.6% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 64.9% |
| CommonsenseQA 2.0 | — | 50% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 113.59 |
| ForecastBench | — | 51.4 |
| HellaSwag | — | 85.3% |
| LAMBADA | — | 78.9% |
| PIQA | — | 82.8% |
| WinoGrande | — | 80.2% |
Math Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 29.3 (#219), Llama 2-70B: 7.5 (#320)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | 1091 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 0% |
| Omni-MATH | 29.6% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 3.3% |
| GSM8K | — | 69.6% |
Knowledge Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 31.5 (#210), Llama 2-70B: 7.4 (#305)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1244 | 1039 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 26.3% |
| MMLU-Pro | 56.9% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.2% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 38.3% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 78.3% |
| BoolQ | — | 88.6% |
| MMLU | — | 69.9% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 60.2% |
| TriviaQA | — | 87.6% |
Multilingual Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 38.7 (#223), Llama 2-70B: 27.9 (#269)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | 1045 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1250 | 994 |
| LMArena Russian | 1198 | 1083 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1258 | 1142 |
| LMArena French | — | 1089 |
| LMArena German | — | 1041 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 927 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 964 |
Instruction Following Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 68.9 (#178), Llama 2-70B: 55.1 (#273)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1221 | 1071 |
| IFEval | 89% | — |
Long Context Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 37.6 (#209), Llama 2-70B: 32.2 (#265)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1240 | 1062 |
Writing & Preference Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 44.0 (#222), Llama 2-70B: 32.5 (#274)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1241 | 1115 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1210 | 1075 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1243 | 1088 |
| WildBench | 73.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Granite 4.0 H Small better than Llama 2-70B?
Granite 4.0 H Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 24.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Granite 4.0 H Small or Llama 2-70B better for coding?
Granite 4.0 H Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.8 versus 30.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Granite 4.0 H Small and Llama 2-70B share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.0 H Small has 19 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-70B has 35.