Model comparison
Claude 2 vs Granite 4.0 H Small
Granite 4.0 H Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Granite 4.0 H Small leads 31.4 to 9.3.
- Granite 4.0 H Small has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude 2 | Granite 4.0 H Small | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | IBM |
| Noometry Index | 25.0 | 36.5 |
| Released | 2023-07-11 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 8 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Granite 4.0 H Small: 36.4 (#209)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1249 |
| HumanEval+ | 61.6% | — |
Reasoning Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Claude 2: 21.7 (#216), Granite 4.0 H Small: 24.4 (#163)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1240 |
| DTBench | 51.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 120.13 | — |
Math Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Claude 2: 9.3 (#320), Granite 4.0 H Small: 31.4 (#223)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.5% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 29.6% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1247 |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | — |
Knowledge Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Claude 2: 16.9 (#287), Granite 4.0 H Small: 32.0 (#215)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34.7% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 56.9% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.2% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 38.3% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1251 |
| MMLU | 78.5% | — |
| TriviaQA | 87.5% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Granite 4.0 H Small: 38.6 (#228)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1216 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1249 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1201 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1258 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Granite 4.0 H Small: 68.7 (#183)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | — | 89% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1222 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Granite 4.0 H Small: 37.7 (#213)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1242 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Granite 4.0 H Small: 43.8 (#227)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1241 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1211 |
| WildBench | — | 73.9% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1242 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 2 better than Granite 4.0 H Small?
Granite 4.0 H Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Claude 2 and Granite 4.0 H Small share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2 has 8 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.0 H Small has 19.