Model comparison

Granite 4.0 H Small vs Kimi K2.7 Code

Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.3 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.0 H Small IBM

36.5

Rank #214 Confirmed

Kimi K2.7 Code Moonshot AI

43.3

Rank #94 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Kimi K2.7 Code leads 53.5 to 32.0.

Side by side

Granite 4.0 H Small and Kimi K2.7 Code specifications
Granite 4.0 H SmallKimi K2.7 Code
ProviderIBMMoonshot AI
Noometry Index36.543.3
Released—2026-06-12
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—262K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.95
Output $ / M tokens—$4
Results tracked1919

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Kimi K2.7 Code leads

Granite 4.0 H Small: 36.4 (#209), Kimi K2.7 Code: 42.9 (#95)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 H SmallKimi K2.7 Code
DeepSWE—30.5%
FrontierCode—30.1%
LMArena WebDev—1473
SciCode—47.5%
WeirdML—54.1%
LMArena Coding1249—
ALE-Bench—886.23

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 4.0 H Small: —, Kimi K2.7 Code: 24.0 (#122)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 H SmallKimi K2.7 Code
APEX-Agents—37.6%
GBAEval—0.9%
Vending-Bench 2—5,083

Reasoning Kimi K2.7 Code leads

Granite 4.0 H Small: 24.4 (#163), Kimi K2.7 Code: 39.0 (#61)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 H SmallKimi K2.7 Code
SimpleBench—57.9%
CritPt—10%
Chess Puzzles—21%
LMArena Hard Prompts1240—
Surface Evolver Bench—48.8%
Epoch Capabilities Index—149.97

Math Kimi K2.7 Code leads

Granite 4.0 H Small: 31.4 (#223), Kimi K2.7 Code: 52.9 (#48)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 H SmallKimi K2.7 Code
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—54%
FrontierMath Tier 4—12.2%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—95.6%
Omni-MATH29.6%—
LMArena Math1247—

Knowledge Kimi K2.7 Code leads

Granite 4.0 H Small: 32.0 (#215), Kimi K2.7 Code: 53.5 (#57)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 H SmallKimi K2.7 Code
GPQA Diamond—87.9%
SimpleQA Verified—36.5%
MMLU-Pro56.9%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.2%—
GPQA (HELM)38.3%—
LMArena Expert1251—

Multilingual Not comparable

Granite 4.0 H Small: 38.6 (#228), Kimi K2.7 Code: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 H SmallKimi K2.7 Code
LMArena Non-English1216—
LMArena Chinese1249—
LMArena Russian1201—
LMArena Spanish1258—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Granite 4.0 H Small: 68.7 (#183), Kimi K2.7 Code: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 H SmallKimi K2.7 Code
IFEval89%—
LMArena Instruction Following1222—

Long Context Not comparable

Granite 4.0 H Small: 37.7 (#213), Kimi K2.7 Code: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 H SmallKimi K2.7 Code
LMArena Longer Query1242—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Granite 4.0 H Small: 43.8 (#227), Kimi K2.7 Code: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 H SmallKimi K2.7 Code
LMArena Text1241—
LMArena Creative Writing1211—
WildBench73.9%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1242—

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.0 H Small better than Kimi K2.7 Code?

Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.3 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 4.0 H Small or Kimi K2.7 Code better for coding?

Kimi K2.7 Code scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.9 versus 36.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.0 H Small and Kimi K2.7 Code share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.0 H Small has 19 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.7 Code has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper