Model comparison
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Granite 4.0 H Small
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT scores higher in 7 categories and Granite 4.0 H Small in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads 47.6 to 31.4.
Side by side
| Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Granite 4.0 H Small | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | |
| Noometry Index | 43.5 | 36.5 |
| Released | 2026-04-02 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | — |
| Max output | 33K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.0675 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.23 | — |
| Results tracked | 28 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 39.0 (#164), Granite 4.0 H Small: 36.4 (#209)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1447 | 1249 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1359 | — |
| SciCode | 40% | — |
| WeirdML | 35.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 927.17 | — |
Reasoning Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 21.8 (#213), Granite 4.0 H Small: 24.4 (#163)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1439 | 1240 |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 6% | — |
| DTBench | 74.9% | — |
| LMCA | 29.7% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 141.85 | — |
Math Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 47.6 (#67), Granite 4.0 H Small: 31.4 (#223)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1470 | 1247 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 82.2% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 29.6% |
Knowledge Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 45.7 (#85), Granite 4.0 H Small: 32.0 (#215)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.2% | 5.2% |
| LMArena Expert | 1447 | 1251 |
| GPQA Diamond | 73.2% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 56.9% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 38.3% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 40.6 (#46), Granite 4.0 H Small: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1260 | — |
Multilingual Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 53.1 (#71), Granite 4.0 H Small: 38.6 (#228)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1421 | 1216 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1495 | 1249 |
| LMArena Russian | 1434 | 1201 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1417 | 1258 |
| LMArena French | 1460 | — |
Instruction Following Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 74.8 (#82), Granite 4.0 H Small: 68.7 (#183)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | 1222 |
| IFEval | — | 89% |
Long Context Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 43.6 (#91), Granite 4.0 H Small: 37.7 (#213)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1428 | 1242 |
Writing & Preference Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 58.6 (#115), Granite 4.0 H Small: 43.8 (#227)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1434 | 1241 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1402 | 1211 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1441 | 1242 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1305 | — |
| WildBench | — | 73.9% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 4 26B A4B IT better than Granite 4.0 H Small?
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 4 26B A4B IT or Granite 4.0 H Small better for coding?
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.0 versus 36.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and Granite 4.0 H Small share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT has 28 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.0 H Small has 19.