Model comparison
Hy4 preview vs QwQ-32B
Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.6 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Hy4 preview leads 54.5 to 36.2.
Side by side
| Hy4 preview | QwQ-32B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 44.6 | 39.4 |
| Released | 2026-08-28 | 2024-11-28 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 64K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.83 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.50 | — |
| Results tracked | 3 | 36 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hy4 preview leads
Hy4 preview: 51.4 (#36), QwQ-32B: 34.9 (#220)
| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | — | 20.9% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1633 | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 44.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 72.2% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1333 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 54.4% |
Reasoning Hy4 preview leads
Hy4 preview: 30.6 (#75), QwQ-32B: 22.9 (#171)
| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 68.2% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 5% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 83.5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1326 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 65% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 137.6 |
| ForecastBench | — | 58.3 |
| LiveBench | — | 72% |
Math Hy4 preview leads
Hy4 preview: 54.5 (#37), QwQ-32B: 36.2 (#123)
| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 59.2% |
| ProofBench | 75% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 77.8% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1359 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Hy4 preview: —, QwQ-32B: 37.2 (#150)
| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 65.3% |
| Confabulations | — | 15.6% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1323 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Hy4 preview: —, QwQ-32B: 45.0 (#171)
| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1306 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1378 |
| LMArena French | — | 1337 |
| LMArena German | — | 1313 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1263 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1278 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1297 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1353 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Hy4 preview: —, QwQ-32B: 72.8 (#131)
| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 81.8% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1297 |
Long Context Not comparable
Hy4 preview: —, QwQ-32B: 49.0 (#11)
| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 83.3% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1308 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Hy4 preview: —, QwQ-32B: 50.9 (#175)
| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1329 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1288 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 80.2% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1257 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1314 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 51.4% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hy4 preview better than QwQ-32B?
Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.6 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hy4 preview or QwQ-32B better for coding?
Hy4 preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.4 versus 34.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hy4 preview and QwQ-32B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hy4 preview has 3 scored results on Noometry and QwQ-32B has 36.