Model comparison

Hy4 preview vs Qwen3.8 27B

Hy4 preview and Qwen3.8 27B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (44.6 vs 45.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

Hy4 preview Tencent

44.6

Rank #73 Reported

Qwen3.8 27B Alibaba (Qwen)

45.3

Rank #64 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Hy4 preview scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3.8 27B in 1 category; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Hy4 preview leads 54.5 to 35.7.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is ProofBench: 75% for Hy4 preview and 16% for Qwen3.8 27B.
  • Qwen3.8 27B is cheaper at $0.99 / $1.49 per million input/output tokens, against $0.83 / $2.50 for Hy4 preview.
  • Hy4 preview accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.

Side by side

Hy4 preview and Qwen3.8 27B specifications
Hy4 previewQwen3.8 27B
ProviderTencentAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index44.645.3
Released2026-08-282026-08-14
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1.05M262K
Max output64K33K
Input $ / M tokens$0.83$0.99
Output $ / M tokens$2.50$1.49
Results tracked328

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hy4 preview leads

Hy4 preview: 51.4 (#36), Qwen3.8 27B: 50.3 (#42)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewQwen3.8 27B
LMArena WebDev16331592
SciCode—46.6%
LMArena Coding—1487

Reasoning Too close to call

Hy4 preview: 30.6 (#75), Qwen3.8 27B: 31.5 (#71)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewQwen3.8 27B
NYT Connections (extended)68.2%54.5%
CritPt—5.4%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1459
DTBench—88%
LMCA—41.4%
Surface Evolver Bench—45%
Epoch Capabilities Index—149.38

Math Hy4 preview leads

Hy4 preview: 54.5 (#37), Qwen3.8 27B: 35.7 (#139)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewQwen3.8 27B
ProofBench75%16%
LMArena Math—1453

Knowledge Not comparable

Hy4 preview: —, Qwen3.8 27B: 40.9 (#105)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewQwen3.8 27B
LMArena Expert—1482

Multimodal Not comparable

Hy4 preview: —, Qwen3.8 27B: 40.5 (#36)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewQwen3.8 27B
LMArena Vision—1270

Multilingual Not comparable

Hy4 preview: —, Qwen3.8 27B: 54.0 (#54)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewQwen3.8 27B
LMArena Non-English—1431
LMArena Chinese—1504
LMArena French—1468
LMArena German—1435
LMArena Japanese—1392
LMArena Korean—1389
LMArena Russian—1421
LMArena Spanish—1444

Instruction Following Not comparable

Hy4 preview: —, Qwen3.8 27B: 75.8 (#54)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewQwen3.8 27B
LMArena Instruction Following—1436

Long Context Not comparable

Hy4 preview: —, Qwen3.8 27B: 44.3 (#66)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewQwen3.8 27B
LMArena Longer Query—1448

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Hy4 preview: —, Qwen3.8 27B: 65.9 (#41)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewQwen3.8 27B
LMArena Text—1441
LMArena Creative Writing—1382
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1671
LMArena Multi-Turn—1443

Frequently asked questions

Is Hy4 preview better than Qwen3.8 27B?

Hy4 preview and Qwen3.8 27B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (44.6 vs 45.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Which is cheaper, Hy4 preview or Qwen3.8 27B?

Qwen3.8 27B is cheaper. It lists at $0.99 per million input tokens and $1.49 per million output tokens; Hy4 preview lists at $0.83 and $2.50.

Is Hy4 preview or Qwen3.8 27B better for coding?

Hy4 preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.4 versus 50.3 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Hy4 preview does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do Hy4 preview and Qwen3.8 27B share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hy4 preview has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.8 27B has 28.

Related comparisons

Go deeper