Model comparison

Hy4 preview vs Phi-4

Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.6 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index. Phi-4 costs 14× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Hy4 preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Hy4 preview Tencent

44.6

Rank #73 Reported

Phi-4 Microsoft

30.9

Rank #269 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where Hy4 preview leads 54.5 to 19.6.
  • Phi-4 is cheaper at $0.07 / $0.14 per million input/output tokens, against $0.83 / $2.50 for Hy4 preview.
  • Hy4 preview accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 128K.

Side by side

Hy4 preview and Phi-4 specifications
Hy4 previewPhi-4
ProviderTencentMicrosoft
Noometry Index44.630.9
Released2026-08-282024-12-11
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1.05M128K
Max output64K4K
Input $ / M tokens$0.83$0.07
Output $ / M tokens$2.50$0.14
Results tracked337

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hy4 preview leads

Hy4 preview: 51.4 (#36), Phi-4: 33.8 (#237)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewPhi-4
LMArena WebDev1633—
BigCodeBench Instruct—45.5%
LiveBench Coding—30.7%
LMArena Coding—1231
BigCodeBench Complete—55.4%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hy4 preview: —, Phi-4: 22.6 (#120)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewPhi-4
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—28.8%
BALROG—11.6%

Reasoning Hy4 preview leads

Hy4 preview: 30.6 (#75), Phi-4: 17.0 (#287)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewPhi-4
NYT Connections (extended)68.2%—
Chess Puzzles—1%
LiveBench Reasoning—47.8%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1220
LiveBench Data Analysis—45.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index—130.43
LiveBench—41.6%

Math Hy4 preview leads

Hy4 preview: 54.5 (#37), Phi-4: 19.6 (#279)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewPhi-4
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—13.8%
ProofBench75%—
LiveBench Math—42%
LMArena Math—1246
MATH Level 5—64.9%

Knowledge Not comparable

Hy4 preview: —, Phi-4: 32.5 (#204)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewPhi-4
GPQA Diamond—56.1%
Confabulations—29.4%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—3.7%
LMArena Expert—1203
MMLU—84.8%

Multilingual Not comparable

Hy4 preview: —, Phi-4: 37.4 (#232)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewPhi-4
LMArena Non-English—1197
LMArena Chinese—1211
LMArena French—1223
LMArena German—1222
LMArena Japanese—1158
LMArena Korean—1151
LMArena Russian—1209
LMArena Spanish—1234

Instruction Following Not comparable

Hy4 preview: —, Phi-4: 60.6 (#246)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewPhi-4
LiveBench Instruction Following—58.4%
LMArena Instruction Following—1201

Long Context Not comparable

Hy4 preview: —, Phi-4: 36.9 (#221)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewPhi-4
LMArena Longer Query—1217

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Hy4 preview: —, Phi-4: 40.7 (#239)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewPhi-4
LMArena Text—1217
LMArena Creative Writing—1182
Short-Story Creative Writing—62.6%
LMArena Multi-Turn—1206
LiveBench Language—25.6%

Frequently asked questions

Is Hy4 preview better than Phi-4?

Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.6 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index. Phi-4 costs 14× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Hy4 preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Hy4 preview or Phi-4?

Phi-4 is cheaper. It lists at $0.07 per million input tokens and $0.14 per million output tokens; Hy4 preview lists at $0.83 and $2.50.

Is Hy4 preview or Phi-4 better for coding?

Hy4 preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.4 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Hy4 preview does, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Hy4 preview and Phi-4 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hy4 preview has 3 scored results on Noometry and Phi-4 has 37.

Related comparisons

Go deeper