Model comparison

Hy4 preview vs o3-mini

Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.6 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Hy4 preview Tencent

44.6

Rank #73 Reported

o3-mini OpenAI

36.7

Rank #205 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where Hy4 preview leads 54.5 to 27.6.
  • Hy4 preview is cheaper at $0.83 / $2.50 per million input/output tokens, against $1.10 / $4.40 for o3-mini.
  • Hy4 preview accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 200K.
  • Hy4 preview has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hy4 preview and o3-mini specifications
Hy4 previewo3-mini
ProviderTencentOpenAI
Noometry Index44.636.7
Released2026-08-282024-12-20
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window1.05M200K
Max output64K100K
Input $ / M tokens$0.83$1.10
Output $ / M tokens$2.50$4.40
Results tracked351

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hy4 preview leads

Hy4 preview: 51.4 (#36), o3-mini: 41.4 (#116)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewo3-mini
Aider Polyglot—60.4%
LMArena WebDev1633—
SciCode—39.8%
GSO—1.3%
WeirdML—43.7%
LiveBench Coding—82.7%
LMArena Coding—1378
CadEval—54%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hy4 preview: —, o3-mini: 29.3 (#79)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewo3-mini
Cybench—22.5%

Reasoning Hy4 preview leads

Hy4 preview: 30.6 (#75), o3-mini: 16.3 (#295)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewo3-mini
ARC-AGI-2—3%
SimpleBench—22.8%
NYT Connections (extended)68.2%—
ARC-AGI-1—34.5%
CritPt—0.3%
Chess Puzzles—17%
LiveBench Reasoning—89.6%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1366
Mystery Game Puzzles—7%
DTBench—68.8%
LiveBench Data Analysis—70.6%
LMCA—19%
Epoch Capabilities Index—140.35
ForecastBench—59.6
LiveBench—75.9%

Math Hy4 preview leads

Hy4 preview: 54.5 (#37), o3-mini: 27.6 (#236)

Knowledge Not comparable

Hy4 preview: —, o3-mini: 38.3 (#135)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewo3-mini
GPQA Diamond—77%
SimpleQA Verified—15.3%
Confabulations—17.9%
LMArena Expert—1364

Multilingual Not comparable

Hy4 preview: —, o3-mini: 45.9 (#159)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewo3-mini
LMArena Non-English—1319
LMArena Chinese—1379
LMArena French—1333
LMArena German—1303
LMArena Japanese—1286
LMArena Korean—1314
LMArena Russian—1304
LMArena Spanish—1321

Instruction Following Not comparable

Hy4 preview: —, o3-mini: 75.3 (#67)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewo3-mini
LiveBench Instruction Following—84.4%
LMArena Instruction Following—1338

Long Context Not comparable

Hy4 preview: —, o3-mini: 33.8 (#251)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewo3-mini
Fiction.LiveBench—50%
LMArena Longer Query—1343

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Hy4 preview: —, o3-mini: 50.4 (#177)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewo3-mini
LMArena Text—1337
LMArena Creative Writing—1286
Short-Story Creative Writing—61.7%
LMArena Multi-Turn—1320
LiveBench Language—50.7%

Frequently asked questions

Is Hy4 preview better than o3-mini?

Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.6 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Hy4 preview or o3-mini?

Hy4 preview is cheaper. It lists at $0.83 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; o3-mini lists at $1.10 and $4.40.

Is Hy4 preview or o3-mini better for coding?

Hy4 preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.4 versus 41.4 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Hy4 preview does, with 1.05M tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks do Hy4 preview and o3-mini share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hy4 preview has 3 scored results on Noometry and o3-mini has 51.

Related comparisons

Go deeper