Model comparison
Hy3 vs Olmo 3 32b Think
Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 38.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Hy3 scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 3 32b Think in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hy3 leads 62.2 to 49.1.
Side by side
| Hy3 | Olmo 3 32b Think | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 44.2 | 38.7 |
| Released | 2026-07-06 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.0825 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.33 | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hy3 leads
Hy3: 46.8 (#63), Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.6 (#172)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1464 | 1319 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1508 | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Hy3: 26.1 (#136), Olmo 3 32b Think: 25.9 (#140)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1447 | 1302 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 41.2% | — |
Math Hy3 leads
Hy3: 40.1 (#93), Olmo 3 32b Think: 36.5 (#165)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1475 | 1316 |
Knowledge Hy3 leads
Hy3: 40.8 (#114), Olmo 3 32b Think: 35.0 (#190)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1460 | 1273 |
Multilingual Hy3 leads
Hy3: 53.5 (#65), Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.2 (#210)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1426 | 1255 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1493 | 1300 |
| LMArena French | 1461 | 1291 |
| LMArena German | 1439 | 1290 |
| LMArena Russian | 1432 | 1254 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1392 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1395 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1456 | — |
Instruction Following Hy3 leads
Hy3: 75.1 (#70), Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.2 (#198)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1426 | 1275 |
Long Context Hy3 leads
Hy3: 44.1 (#75), Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#182)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1442 | 1296 |
Writing & Preference Hy3 leads
Hy3: 62.2 (#81), Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.1 (#193)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1439 | 1300 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1402 | 1256 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1436 | 1290 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hy3 better than Olmo 3 32b Think?
Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 38.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hy3 or Olmo 3 32b Think better for coding?
Hy3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.8 versus 38.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hy3 and Olmo 3 32b Think share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hy3 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.