Model comparison

Hy3 vs Qwen3.5 Plus

Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 42.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Hy3 Tencent

44.2

Rank #79 Confirmed

Qwen3.5 Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

42.9

Rank #106 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.5 Plus leads 49.6 to 40.1.
  • Hy3 is cheaper at $0.13 / $0.53 per million input/output tokens, against $0.40 / $2.40 for Qwen3.5 Plus.
  • Qwen3.5 Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.
  • Hy3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hy3 and Qwen3.5 Plus specifications
Hy3Qwen3.5 Plus
ProviderTencentAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index44.242.9
Released2026-07-062026-02-16
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window262K1M
Max output128K66K
Input $ / M tokens$0.13$0.40
Output $ / M tokens$0.53$2.40
Results tracked1915

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Hy3: 46.8 (#63), Qwen3.5 Plus: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3Qwen3.5 Plus
LMArena WebDev1508—
LMArena Coding1464—
ALE-Bench—621.92

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hy3: —, Qwen3.5 Plus: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3Qwen3.5 Plus
Vending-Bench 2—0.54

Reasoning Qwen3.5 Plus leads

Hy3: 26.1 (#136), Qwen3.5 Plus: 32.8 (#74)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3Qwen3.5 Plus
NYT Connections (extended)41.2%—
Chess Puzzles—22%
LMArena Hard Prompts1447—
Mystery Game Puzzles—17%
DTBench—80.5%
LMCA—36.4%
Epoch Capabilities Index—146.78

Math Qwen3.5 Plus leads

Hy3: 40.1 (#93), Qwen3.5 Plus: 49.6 (#61)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3Qwen3.5 Plus
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—86.7%
LMArena Math1475—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—21%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—2.1%

Knowledge Qwen3.5 Plus leads

Hy3: 40.8 (#114), Qwen3.5 Plus: 46.0 (#83)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3Qwen3.5 Plus
GPQA Diamond—84.8%
SimpleQA Verified—25.4%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—10.7%
LMArena Expert1460—

Multilingual Not comparable

Hy3: 53.5 (#65), Qwen3.5 Plus: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3Qwen3.5 Plus
LMArena Non-English1426—
LMArena Chinese1493—
LMArena French1461—
LMArena German1439—
LMArena Japanese1392—
LMArena Korean1395—
LMArena Russian1432—
LMArena Spanish1456—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Hy3: 75.1 (#70), Qwen3.5 Plus: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3Qwen3.5 Plus
LMArena Instruction Following1426—

Long Context Hy3 leads

Hy3: 44.1 (#75), Qwen3.5 Plus: 43.0 (#113)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3Qwen3.5 Plus
CL-bench—19.8%
CL-bench Life—12.4%
LMArena Longer Query1442—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Hy3: 62.2 (#81), Qwen3.5 Plus: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3Qwen3.5 Plus
LMArena Text1439—
LMArena Creative Writing1402—
LMArena Multi-Turn1436—

Frequently asked questions

Is Hy3 better than Qwen3.5 Plus?

Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 42.9 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Hy3 or Qwen3.5 Plus?

Hy3 is cheaper. It lists at $0.13 per million input tokens and $0.53 per million output tokens; Qwen3.5 Plus lists at $0.40 and $2.40.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.5 Plus does, with 1M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do Hy3 and Qwen3.5 Plus share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hy3 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Plus has 15.

Related comparisons

Go deeper