Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 vs Hy3
Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 42.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 scores higher in 1 category and Hy3 in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hy3 leads 62.5 to 57.6.
- Hy3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Hy3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 42.2 | 43.6 |
| Released | — | 2026-07-06 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.13 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.53 |
| Results tracked | 13 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hy3 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 42.1 (#97), Hy3: 46.6 (#60)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1447 | 1465 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1509 |
Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 27.8 (#97), Hy3: 25.0 (#134)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1415 | 1449 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 41.2% |
Math Hy3 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 35.8 (#136), Hy3: 37.4 (#98)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1404 | 1475 |
Knowledge Too close to call
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 39.7 (#115), Hy3: 40.2 (#108)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1445 | 1461 |
Multilingual Hy3 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 50.4 (#121), Hy3: 53.7 (#60)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1381 | 1427 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1373 | 1496 |
| LMArena Russian | 1393 | 1435 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1390 | 1448 |
| LMArena French | — | 1461 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1390 |
Instruction Following Hy3 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 73.1 (#121), Hy3: 75.3 (#68)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1381 | 1425 |
Long Context Hy3 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 42.7 (#114), Hy3: 44.1 (#70)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1401 | 1443 |
Writing & Preference Hy3 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 57.6 (#123), Hy3: 62.5 (#75)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1396 | 1442 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1331 | 1399 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1380 | 1436 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 better than Hy3?
Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 42.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 or Hy3 better for coding?
Hy3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.6 versus 42.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 and Hy3 share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 has 13 scored results on Noometry and Hy3 has 17.