Noometry

Model comparison

Hy3 vs Muse Spark 1.2

Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 44.2 on the Noometry Index. Hy3 costs 8.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Muse Spark 1.2's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Hy3 Tencent

44.2

Rank #79 Confirmed

Muse Spark 1.2 Meta

50.3

Rank #48 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Hy3 scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark 1.2 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Muse Spark 1.2 leads 51.3 to 26.1.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 41.2% for Hy3 and 79.2% for Muse Spark 1.2.
  • Hy3 is cheaper at $0.13 / $0.53 per million input/output tokens, against $1.25 / $4.25 for Muse Spark 1.2.
  • Muse Spark 1.2 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.
  • Hy3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hy3Muse Spark 1.2
ProviderTencentMeta
Noometry Index44.250.3
Released2026-07-062026-08-05
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window262K1.05M
Max output128K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.13$1.25
Output $ / M tokens$0.53$4.25
Results tracked1931

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Hy3: 46.8 (#63), Muse Spark 1.2: 49.2 (#51)

BenchmarkHy3Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena WebDev15081533
LMArena Coding14641495
DeepSWE—54.9%
FrontierSWE—12%
SciCode—56.4%
WeirdML—60.3%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hy3: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 29.4 (#87)

BenchmarkHy3Muse Spark 1.2
APEX-Agents—36.4%
GDP.pdf—16%

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Hy3: 26.1 (#136), Muse Spark 1.2: 51.3 (#34)

BenchmarkHy3Muse Spark 1.2
NYT Connections (extended)41.2%79.2%
LMArena Hard Prompts14471486
SimpleBench—74.5%
CritPt—17.7%
DTBench—94.7%
LMCA—48.4%
Epoch Capabilities Index—154.87

Math Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Hy3: 40.1 (#93), Muse Spark 1.2: 46.4 (#70)

BenchmarkHy3Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Math14751471
ProofBench—43%

Knowledge Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Hy3: 40.8 (#114), Muse Spark 1.2: 54.1 (#53)

BenchmarkHy3Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Expert14601480
SimpleQA Verified—60.3%

Multimodal Not comparable

Hy3: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 43.4 (#25)

BenchmarkHy3Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Vision—1305

Multilingual Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Hy3: 53.5 (#65), Muse Spark 1.2: 57.1 (#11)

BenchmarkHy3Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Non-English14261478
LMArena Chinese14931511
LMArena French14611513
LMArena Russian14321487
LMArena Spanish14561498
LMArena German1439—
LMArena Japanese1392—
LMArena Korean1395—

Instruction Following Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Hy3: 75.1 (#70), Muse Spark 1.2: 76.7 (#36)

BenchmarkHy3Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Instruction Following14261461

Long Context Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Hy3: 44.1 (#75), Muse Spark 1.2: 45.2 (#48)

BenchmarkHy3Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Longer Query14421475

Writing & Preference Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Hy3: 62.2 (#81), Muse Spark 1.2: 72.3 (#14)

BenchmarkHy3Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text14391482
LMArena Creative Writing14021449
LMArena Multi-Turn14361494
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1840

Frequently asked questions

Is Hy3 better than Muse Spark 1.2?

Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 44.2 on the Noometry Index. Hy3 costs 8.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Muse Spark 1.2's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Hy3 or Muse Spark 1.2?

Hy3 is cheaper. It lists at $0.13 per million input tokens and $0.53 per million output tokens; Muse Spark 1.2 lists at $1.25 and $4.25.

Is Hy3 or Muse Spark 1.2 better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.2 versus 46.8 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Muse Spark 1.2 does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do Hy3 and Muse Spark 1.2 share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hy3 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.2 has 31.

Related comparisons

Go deeper