Model comparison

Hy3 vs Mistral Medium 3.5

Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 40.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

Hy3 Tencent

44.2

Rank #79 Confirmed

Mistral Medium 3.5 Mistral AI

40.2

Rank #152 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Hy3 scores higher in 8 categories and Mistral Medium 3.5 in 0 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Hy3 leads 46.8 to 36.0.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 41.2% for Hy3 and 12.9% for Mistral Medium 3.5.
  • Hy3 is cheaper at $0.0825 / $0.33 per million input/output tokens, against $1.50 / $7.50 for Mistral Medium 3.5.

Side by side

Hy3 and Mistral Medium 3.5 specifications
Hy3Mistral Medium 3.5
ProviderTencentMistral AI
Noometry Index44.240.2
Released2026-07-06—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K262K
Max output128K210K
Input $ / M tokens$0.0825$1.50
Output $ / M tokens$0.33$7.50
Results tracked1922

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hy3 leads

Hy3: 46.8 (#63), Mistral Medium 3.5: 36.0 (#213)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena WebDev15081264
LMArena Coding14641461

Reasoning Hy3 leads

Hy3: 26.1 (#136), Mistral Medium 3.5: 17.3 (#295)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3Mistral Medium 3.5
NYT Connections (extended)41.2%12.9%
LMArena Hard Prompts14471436
Kagi LLM Benchmark—41.4%
Epoch Capabilities Index—141.35

Math Hy3 leads

Hy3: 40.1 (#93), Mistral Medium 3.5: 39.1 (#113)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Math14751431

Knowledge Too close to call

Hy3: 40.8 (#114), Mistral Medium 3.5: 40.0 (#126)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Expert14601432

Multimodal Not comparable

Hy3: —, Mistral Medium 3.5: 38.3 (#65)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Vision—1223

Multilingual Hy3 leads

Hy3: 53.5 (#65), Mistral Medium 3.5: 51.9 (#100)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Non-English14261404
LMArena Chinese14931442
LMArena French14611448
LMArena German14391451
LMArena Korean13951385
LMArena Russian14321395
LMArena Spanish14561409
LMArena Japanese1392—

Instruction Following Too close to call

Hy3: 75.1 (#70), Mistral Medium 3.5: 74.6 (#90)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Instruction Following14261415

Long Context Too close to call

Hy3: 44.1 (#75), Mistral Medium 3.5: 43.2 (#103)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Longer Query14421415

Writing & Preference Hy3 leads

Hy3: 62.2 (#81), Mistral Medium 3.5: 58.5 (#117)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text14391421
LMArena Creative Writing14021374
LMArena Multi-Turn14361423
EQ-Bench 4—993

Frequently asked questions

Is Hy3 better than Mistral Medium 3.5?

Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 40.2 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Hy3 or Mistral Medium 3.5?

Hy3 is cheaper. It lists at $0.0825 per million input tokens and $0.33 per million output tokens; Mistral Medium 3.5 lists at $1.50 and $7.50.

Is Hy3 or Mistral Medium 3.5 better for coding?

Hy3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.8 versus 36.0 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 262K tokens.

How many benchmarks do Hy3 and Mistral Medium 3.5 share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hy3 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium 3.5 has 22.

Related comparisons

Go deeper