Model comparison

Hy3 vs MiniMax-M2.5

Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 38.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.

Hy3 Tencent

44.2

Rank #79 Confirmed

MiniMax-M2.5 MiniMax

38.3

Rank #188 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Hy3 scores higher in 7 categories and MiniMax-M2.5 in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Hy3 leads 40.1 to 26.9.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 41.2% for Hy3 and 16.8% for MiniMax-M2.5.
  • Hy3 is cheaper at $0.0825 / $0.33 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $1.20 for MiniMax-M2.5.
  • Hy3 accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 205K.

Side by side

Hy3 and MiniMax-M2.5 specifications
Hy3MiniMax-M2.5
ProviderTencentMiniMax
Noometry Index44.238.3
Released2026-07-062026-02-12
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K205K
Max output128K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.0825$0.30
Output $ / M tokens$0.33$1.20
Results tracked1933

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiniMax-M2.5 leads

Hy3: 46.8 (#63), MiniMax-M2.5: 48.1 (#58)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3MiniMax-M2.5
LMArena WebDev15081387
LMArena Coding14641381
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—75.8%
SWE-bench Multilingual—68.3%
ALE-Bench—618.17

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hy3: —, MiniMax-M2.5: 30.4 (#77)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3MiniMax-M2.5
Terminal-Bench—42.7%
Vending-Bench 2—-23.16

Reasoning Hy3 leads

Hy3: 26.1 (#136), MiniMax-M2.5: 17.5 (#292)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3MiniMax-M2.5
NYT Connections (extended)41.2%16.8%
LMArena Hard Prompts14471372
ARC-AGI-2—4.9%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—55.2%
ARC-AGI-1—63.7%
Epoch Capabilities Index—146.68

Math Hy3 leads

Hy3: 40.1 (#93), MiniMax-M2.5: 26.9 (#253)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3MiniMax-M2.5
LMArena Math14751378
ProofBench—4%

Knowledge Hy3 leads

Hy3: 40.8 (#114), MiniMax-M2.5: 39.2 (#135)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3MiniMax-M2.5
LMArena Expert14601379
Vectara Hallucination Rate—9.1%

Multilingual Hy3 leads

Hy3: 53.5 (#65), MiniMax-M2.5: 47.1 (#152)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3MiniMax-M2.5
LMArena Non-English14261338
LMArena Chinese14931393
LMArena French14611362
LMArena German14391362
LMArena Japanese13921171
LMArena Korean13951232
LMArena Russian14321358
LMArena Spanish14561354

Instruction Following Hy3 leads

Hy3: 75.1 (#70), MiniMax-M2.5: 71.5 (#148)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3MiniMax-M2.5
LMArena Instruction Following14261353

Long Context Hy3 leads

Hy3: 44.1 (#75), MiniMax-M2.5: 37.5 (#216)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3MiniMax-M2.5
LMArena Longer Query14421366
CL-bench—11.4%
CL-bench Life—6.3%

Writing & Preference Hy3 leads

Hy3: 62.2 (#81), MiniMax-M2.5: 53.9 (#153)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3MiniMax-M2.5
LMArena Text14391359
LMArena Creative Writing14021331
LMArena Multi-Turn14361364
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1361

Frequently asked questions

Is Hy3 better than MiniMax-M2.5?

Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 38.3 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Hy3 or MiniMax-M2.5?

Hy3 is cheaper. It lists at $0.0825 per million input tokens and $0.33 per million output tokens; MiniMax-M2.5 lists at $0.30 and $1.20.

Is Hy3 or MiniMax-M2.5 better for coding?

MiniMax-M2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.1 versus 46.8 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Hy3 does, with 262K tokens against 205K.

How many benchmarks do Hy3 and MiniMax-M2.5 share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hy3 has 19 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2.5 has 33.

Related comparisons

Go deeper