Model comparison
Hy3 vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct
Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
NVIDIASummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hy3 scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hy3 leads 62.2 to 43.4.
Side by side
| Hy3 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | NVIDIA |
| Noometry Index | 44.2 | 35.9 |
| Released | 2026-07-06 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.0825 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.33 | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hy3 leads
Hy3: 46.8 (#63), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 35.6 (#222)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1464 | 1223 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1508 | — |
Reasoning Hy3 leads
Hy3: 26.1 (#136), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 23.5 (#177)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1447 | 1203 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 41.2% | — |
Math Hy3 leads
Hy3: 40.1 (#93), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 34.6 (#193)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1475 | 1230 |
Knowledge Hy3 leads
Hy3: 40.8 (#114), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 31.9 (#218)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1460 | 1167 |
Multilingual Hy3 leads
Hy3: 53.5 (#65), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 36.1 (#241)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1426 | 1181 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1493 | 1180 |
| LMArena Russian | 1432 | 1187 |
| LMArena French | 1461 | — |
| LMArena German | 1439 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1392 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1395 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1456 | — |
Instruction Following Hy3 leads
Hy3: 75.1 (#70), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 62.9 (#233)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1426 | 1201 |
Long Context Hy3 leads
Hy3: 44.1 (#75), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 36.5 (#230)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1442 | 1205 |
Writing & Preference Hy3 leads
Hy3: 62.2 (#81), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 43.4 (#229)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1439 | 1228 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1402 | 1213 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1436 | 1227 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hy3 better than Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct?
Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hy3 or Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct better for coding?
Hy3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.8 versus 35.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hy3 and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hy3 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct has 12.