Model comparison
Gemma 2 2b IT vs Hunyuan Vision 1.5
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 33.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.
Google
TencentSummary
- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 2b IT scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads 60.1 to 36.5.
- Gemma 2 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 2 2b IT | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | |
| Noometry Index | 33.1 | 43.1 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 17 | 9 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#273), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 41.8 (#119)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1112 | 1418 |
Reasoning Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 21.4 (#224), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 28.9 (#97)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1416 |
Math Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.6 (#212), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1135 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.9 (#231), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1096 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: —, Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 35.7 (#84)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1180 |
Multilingual Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#257), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 50.3 (#125)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1121 | 1382 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | — |
| LMArena French | 1157 | — |
| LMArena German | 1114 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1083 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1055 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1140 | — |
Instruction Following Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 57.8 (#263), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 73.7 (#117)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1118 | 1397 |
Long Context Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.3 (#250), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 42.9 (#115)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1130 | 1404 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.5 (#263), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 60.1 (#100)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1156 | 1405 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1147 | 1388 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1118 | 1422 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2 2b IT better than Hunyuan Vision 1.5?
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 33.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 2 2b IT or Hunyuan Vision 1.5 better for coding?
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 2b IT and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 share?
8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 2b IT has 17 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 has 9.