Model comparison
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 vs Trinity Large Thinking
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Arcee AISummary
- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher in 6 categories and Trinity Large Thinking in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads 28.9 to 16.9.
- Trinity Large Thinking has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Trinity Large Thinking | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Arcee AI |
| Noometry Index | 43.1 | 38.6 |
| Released | — | 2026-04-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 80K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.25 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.80 |
| Results tracked | 9 | 24 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 41.8 (#119), Trinity Large Thinking: 34.1 (#244)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1418 | 1381 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1238 |
| SciCode | — | 36.1% |
Reasoning Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 28.9 (#97), Trinity Large Thinking: 16.9 (#298)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1416 | 1350 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 16.5% |
| CritPt | — | 0.9% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 41.6% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 15.6% |
Math Not comparable
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —, Trinity Large Thinking: 37.6 (#149)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1366 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —, Trinity Large Thinking: 40.9 (#113)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 6.9% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1360 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 35.7 (#84), Trinity Large Thinking: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1180 | — |
Multilingual Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 50.3 (#125), Trinity Large Thinking: 46.2 (#160)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1382 | 1325 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1373 |
| LMArena French | — | 1374 |
| LMArena German | — | 1356 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1311 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1306 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1337 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1357 |
Instruction Following Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 73.7 (#117), Trinity Large Thinking: 70.5 (#162)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1397 | 1334 |
Long Context Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 42.9 (#115), Trinity Large Thinking: 41.3 (#144)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1404 | 1355 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 60.1 (#100), Trinity Large Thinking: 53.8 (#158)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1405 | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1388 | 1320 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1422 | 1342 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Vision 1.5 better than Trinity Large Thinking?
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Vision 1.5 or Trinity Large Thinking better for coding?
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 34.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Vision 1.5 and Trinity Large Thinking share?
8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Vision 1.5 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Trinity Large Thinking has 24.