Model comparison
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 vs Olmo 3 32b Think
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 38.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher in 6 categories and Olmo 3 32b Think in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads 60.1 to 49.1.
- Olmo 3 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Olmo 3 32b Think | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 43.1 | 38.7 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 41.8 (#119), Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.6 (#172)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1418 | 1319 |
Reasoning Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 28.9 (#97), Olmo 3 32b Think: 25.9 (#140)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1416 | 1302 |
Math Not comparable
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —, Olmo 3 32b Think: 36.5 (#165)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1316 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —, Olmo 3 32b Think: 35.0 (#190)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1273 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 35.7 (#84), Olmo 3 32b Think: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1180 | — |
Multilingual Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 50.3 (#125), Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.2 (#210)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1382 | 1255 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1300 |
| LMArena French | — | 1291 |
| LMArena German | — | 1290 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1254 |
Instruction Following Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 73.7 (#117), Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.2 (#198)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1397 | 1275 |
Long Context Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 42.9 (#115), Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#182)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1404 | 1296 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 60.1 (#100), Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.1 (#193)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1405 | 1300 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1388 | 1256 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1422 | 1290 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Vision 1.5 better than Olmo 3 32b Think?
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 38.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Vision 1.5 or Olmo 3 32b Think better for coding?
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 38.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Vision 1.5 and Olmo 3 32b Think share?
8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Vision 1.5 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.