Model comparison
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 vs Qwen Max
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 34.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher in 6 categories and Qwen Max in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads 60.1 to 47.8.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Qwen Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 43.1 | 34.7 |
| Released | — | 2024-04-03 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 33K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.60 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $6.40 |
| Results tracked | 9 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 41.8 (#119), Qwen Max: 30.7 (#292)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1418 | 1288 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 21.8% |
Reasoning Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 28.9 (#97), Qwen Max: 25.1 (#151)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1416 | 1269 |
Math Not comparable
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —, Qwen Max: 22.3 (#276)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 16.1% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1275 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 67.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —, Qwen Max: 30.3 (#228)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 56.1% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1248 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 35.7 (#84), Qwen Max: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1180 | — |
Multilingual Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 50.3 (#125), Qwen Max: 41.8 (#202)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1382 | 1263 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1254 |
| LMArena French | — | 1330 |
| LMArena German | — | 1254 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1205 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1142 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1274 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1290 |
Instruction Following Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 73.7 (#117), Qwen Max: 66.5 (#208)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1397 | 1262 |
Long Context Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 42.9 (#115), Qwen Max: 39.4 (#180)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1404 | 1288 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 60.1 (#100), Qwen Max: 47.8 (#205)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1405 | 1282 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1388 | 1248 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1422 | 1277 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Vision 1.5 better than Qwen Max?
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 34.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Vision 1.5 or Qwen Max better for coding?
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 30.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Vision 1.5 and Qwen Max share?
8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Vision 1.5 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Max has 23.