Model comparison
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 vs Muse Spark
Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 43.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
MetaSummary
- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multimodal, where Muse Spark leads 43.4 to 35.7.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Muse Spark | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 43.1 | 50.6 |
| Released | — | 2026-04-08 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 27 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Muse Spark leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 41.8 (#119), Muse Spark: 46.2 (#69)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Muse Spark |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1418 | 1481 |
| SciCode | — | 51.5% |
Reasoning Muse Spark leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 28.9 (#97), Muse Spark: 35.9 (#67)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Muse Spark |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1416 | 1474 |
| CritPt | — | 11.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 152.04 |
Math Not comparable
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —, Muse Spark: 47.8 (#66)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Muse Spark |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 88.9% |
| ProofBench | — | 17% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1455 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 39% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 14.6% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —, Muse Spark: 65.7 (#13)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Muse Spark |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 89.8% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 40.6% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1457 |
Multimodal Muse Spark leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 35.7 (#84), Muse Spark: 43.4 (#24)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Muse Spark |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1180 | 1306 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1444 |
Multilingual Muse Spark leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 50.3 (#125), Muse Spark: 56.1 (#24)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Muse Spark |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1382 | 1464 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1509 |
| LMArena French | — | 1497 |
| LMArena German | — | 1497 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1459 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1466 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1472 |
Instruction Following Muse Spark leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 73.7 (#117), Muse Spark: 75.9 (#51)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Muse Spark |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1397 | 1442 |
Long Context Muse Spark leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 42.9 (#115), Muse Spark: 44.4 (#69)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Muse Spark |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1404 | 1451 |
Writing & Preference Muse Spark leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 60.1 (#100), Muse Spark: 66.0 (#39)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Muse Spark |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1405 | 1474 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1388 | 1459 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1422 | 1477 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Vision 1.5 better than Muse Spark?
Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 43.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Vision 1.5 or Muse Spark better for coding?
Muse Spark scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.2 versus 41.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Vision 1.5 and Muse Spark share?
9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Vision 1.5 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark has 27.